Clinico-Pathological Profile and Treatment of Abdominal Tuberculosis- A One Year Experience in Rohilkhand Region

Clinico-Pathological Profile and Treatment of Abdominal Tuberculosis

Authors

  • Shailendra Kaushik
  • Alok Ranjan
  • Sharad Seth
  • S.M Sharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i3.1240

Keywords:

Abdominal Tuberculosis, Anti Tubercular Drug, Perforation

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization aimed to dramatically reduce the global burden of tuberculosis by 2015 by ensuring that all tuberculosis patients benefited from universal access to high-quality diagnosis and patient-centered treatment. India accounts for 26% of all tuberculosis cases reported globally, and hence represent the largest affected population group in any country. Aim & Objective: To studies the clinical pattern of abdominal tuberculosis, diagnostic methods and various modalities of treatment of abdominal tuberculosis. Methods: A prospective study which includes clinically suspected case of abdominal tuberculosis during one year study period from November 2015 to October 2016. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 22.0. Chi-square test, unpaired sample‘t’-test and ANOVA was used to compare the data. A “p†value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Most patients could be managed conservatively and full compliance of anti-tubercular treatment led to complete cure and few relapses in our short follow up. [Shailendra K NJIRM 2017; 8(3):30-35]

References

1. Corbet EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams BG, et al. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003. 163(9): 1009–21.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Global tuberculosis report 2014. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
3. Lukoye D, Adatu F, Musisi K, Kasule GW, Were W, et al. Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance among New and Previously Treated Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis Patients in Uganda: Results of the First National Survey. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(8): e70763.
4. World Health Organization: WHO Report on Global Tuberculosis Control: Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
5. Government of India. TB India-2013. Revised National TB Control Programme, Annual Status Report. Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2013.
6. Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Ind J Med Res 2004;124:316-53
7. Chugh SN, Jain V. Abdominal Tuberculosis — Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management. APPI Medicine Update 2007; pp. 600-608.
8. Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004; 120: 305-315.
9. Khan MR, Khan IR, Pal KNM: Diagnostic issues in Abdominal Tuberculosis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2001; 51: 138-140.
10. Shaikh MS, Dholia KR, Jalbani MA. Prevalence of intestinal tuberculosis in cases of acute abdomen. Pakistan J Surg. 2007, 23: 52-56.
11. Engin G, Balk E. Imaging findings of Intestinal Tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005, 29: 37-41.
12. World Health Organization. Groups at risk: WHO report on the tuberculosis epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996.
13. Tandon HD,Prakash A. Pathology of intestinal tuberculosis and its distinction from crohn’s disease. Gut 1972; 13:260–269
14. Bhansali SK. Abdominal tuberculosis: experience with 300 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 1977; 67: 324.
15. Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J 1998; 74: 459.
16. O’Reilly L, Daborn C. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tuberc Lung Dis 1995; 76[Suppl 1]:1.
17. Daniel, Thomas M., Tuberculosis; In Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine; 13th edition, Vol. I, New Delhi, McGraw-Hill Inc., 1994, 710.
18. Edlin BR, Tokars JI, Grieco MH, et al. An outbreak of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; N. Engl. J. Med 1992; 326: 1514.
19. Marshall JB. Tuberculosis of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Peritoneum. The American Journal of Gastroenterology; 1993; 88: 989.
20. Ahmed ME, Hassan MA. Abdominal tuberculosis; Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl, 1994; 76(2): 75.
21. Lazarus AA, Thilagar B. Abdominal Tuberculosis. Dis Mon 2007; 53:32-38.
22. Miah AR, Sharma YR, Rahman MT, Raihan A, Roy PK, Hasan M. Clinico-pathological profile of patients with abdominal tuberculosis. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2011; 9(2):169-75.
23. Saaiq M, Shah SA, Zubair M. Abdominal Tuberculosis: Epidemiologic profile and management experience of 233 cases. JPMA 2012; 62: 704-707.
24. Bhargava DK, Shriniwas, Chopra P. Peritoneal tuberculosis; laparoscopic pattern and its diagnostic accuracy. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:109-12.
25. Khan MR, Khan TR, Pal KMI. Diagnostic Issues in Abdominal Tuberculosis. JPMA 2001; 51:138.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-02

How to Cite

Kaushik, S., Ranjan, A., Seth, S., & Sharma, S. (2018). Clinico-Pathological Profile and Treatment of Abdominal Tuberculosis- A One Year Experience in Rohilkhand Region: Clinico-Pathological Profile and Treatment of Abdominal Tuberculosis. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 8(3), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i3.1240

Issue

Section

Original Articles