Impact of Education on Antenatal Care among Pregnant Women in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bareilly District Uttar Pradesh, India
Impact of Education on Antenatal Care among Pregnant Women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v6i1.858Keywords:
Education, antenatal care, pregnant womenAbstract
Background: Every year more than half a million women die and many millions more suffer disabilities from pregnancy and pregnancy related causes in developing countries. India accounts 20 percent of global maternal deaths, in spite of advancement of public health and medical technology. Many of the maternal deaths could be prevented with well-known intervention such as antenatal care and skilled attendant at birth. Objective: To determine the effect of education on antenatal care among pregnant women. Methodology: A descriptive cross sectional study was conducted among pregnant women who came to ante natal clinic of obstetrics department of Rohilkhand medical college, Bareilly during January-March 2014 by using pre-designed, pretested schedule. A total of 300 pregnant women were clinically examined. Written consent was taken. Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS Version 17. Result: In present study 69% women were literate and 88% their husbands were literate. The overall 83.7% antenatal care was found in which 66.3% were regular. 90.8% antenatal care found among literate women while 67.7% among illiterate. Regular antenatal care was more (76.3%) among literate women. Conclusion: Low level of awareness and poor interest about antenatal care was found among illiterate women. They were not conscious about regular antenatal care, tetanus toxoid immunization, iron folic acid supplementation and extra diet during pregnancy. [Singh P NJIRM 2015; 6(1):66-71]
References
2. Kulkarni MS, Nimbalkar MR. Influence of socio-demographic factors on the use of antenatal care. Indian J. Prev. Soc. Med. 2008; 39 (3): 98-102.
3. Gonzalez DG, Portino MC, Ruiz MT. Knowledge Gaps in scientific literature on maternal mortality: a systemic review. Bulletin of World Health Organization 2006; 84 (11).
4. Make every mother and child count. World Health Day, 7 April 2005. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2005.
5. Antenatal care in developing Countries. An analysis of trends, levels and differentials, 1990-2001.WHO and UNICEF, 2003.
6. Pavalavalli G. Poverty, women's status and utilization of health services in Egypt. Paperprepared for presentation at the IUSSP seminar on women, Poverty and Demographic change, Daxaca, Mexico, 1994, 25-28.
7. NFHS-II India. National Family Health Survey India 1998-99. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai.
8. Reproductive and Child Health Programme. Government of India, Department of Family Welfare.
9. Mahajan BK. Methods in Biostatistics. 7th edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2010: 80-86.
10. Agarwal T, Kocher GK, Goel S. Impact of iron supplementation on anaemia during pregnancy. Ethno-Med. 2008; 2 (2): 149-51.
11. Ahmed N, Kalakoti P. The prevalence of anaemia and associated factors in pregnant women in rural Indian community. Australasian Medical Journal 2010; 1(5): 276-80.
12. Shidhaye PR, Giri PA, Nagaonkar SN, Shidhaye RR. Prevalence of anaemia in postnatal women at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai. J Med Nutr Nutraceut 2012; 1: 54-57.
13. Kiwuwa MS, Mufubenga P. Use of antenatal care, maternity services, intermittent presumptive treatment by pregnant women in Luwero district, Uganda. Malaria J. 2008; 7 (44): 01-06.
14. Nutritional anaemia. National Family Health Survey 2005-2006. volume 1. (NHFS 3) Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi 2007. P 308-09.
15. Singh P, Yadav RJ. Antenatal care of pregnant women in India. Indian J Community Med. 2000; 25 (3):112-17.
