Clinical Relevance Of Morphological Variations In Origin And Insertion Of Lumbricals Of Hand In South Gujarat Population
Clinical Relevance Of Variation Of Lumbricals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i6.2248Keywords:
Lumbrical, carpal tunnel syndrome, split insertion, misplaced insertion, bipennateAbstract
Background & objectives: Lumbrical muscles, though small in size, have a significantly greater role to play in the intricate movements of the fingers.The great functional significance and morphological variations of lumbrical muscles as described in the literature, prompted us to undertake a detailed study of these muscles to know more about it and its significant value in the design of surgical procedures. Methods: We dissected lumbricals of hands of 40 human adult cadavers which were available from the Department of Anatomy. In the present study, variation in origin (include architecture), insertion (include split insertions, misplaced insertions or absence of muscles), the lengths of muscle belly and tendon of all lumbricals were studied and noted. Results: We found variations were more common on the right side. The second lumbrical was bipennate in 12.5% cases. The third lumbrical showed split insertion in 15% cases. The fourth lumbrical showed misplaced insertion in 10% cases. The proximal attachment of lumbricals can extend into the carpal tunnel (specially first and second) in 15% cases. Conclusion: The study provides valuable information to surgeons thus avoiding complications from local anesthetic, surgical and other invasive procedures.
References
2. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dusse KJE, Ferguson MWJ: Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed.; Churchill Livingstone, London; 1995 pp 861-862.
3. Kaplan EB: Kaplan’s Functional and Surgical Anatomy of Hand. In: The Hand; J. B. Lippinott Company, Philadelphia; 1953, pp 12-13.
4. Bryce TH: Quains Elements of Anatomy. In: Myology. 11th ed., Schafer ES, Syington J, Bryce TH, eds.; Longmans Green And Co, New York; 1923, pp 134.
5. Romanes G.J. Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy.15th ed. Vol 01 (Upper and Lower Limbs), New York: Oxford Universty Press 1986: pp 76-81.
6. Joshi SD, Joshi SS, Athavale SA. Lumbrical Muscles and Carpal Tunnel. J Anat Soc India 2005; 54(1): 12-15.
7. M.L. Ajmani, Morphological variations of lumbrical muscles in the human hand with some observations on its nerve supply, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 3, 2001, 20–25.
8. Ashwini M Mutalik, et al, Morphological variations in the origin and insertion of lumbricals of the upper limb in cadavers. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011 Apr, Vol-5(2):278-281
9. Siegel DB, Kuzma G, Eakins D. Anatomic investigation of the role of lumbricals
muscle in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 1995; 20(5):860-863.
10. Chaudruc JM, Florenza F, Riviere C, Arnaud JP. White finger and hypertrophy of the lumbrical muscles. Chir Main. 2000 Sep; 19(4):232-4
11. M.A. Entin, Carpal tunnel syndrome and its variants, Surgical Clinics of North America, 48, 1968, 1097-1112.
12. Cobb TK, An KN, Cooney WP. Effect of lumbrical muscle incursion within the carpal tunnel on carpal tunnel pressure: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995; 20 (2):186-92.
13. Basu S, Hazary SS. Variations of the lumbrical muscle of the hand. Anat Rec, 1960; 136: 501-4.
14. H.J. Mehta and W.U. Gardner, A study of lumbrical muscles in the human hand, Am J Anat, 109, 1961, 227–238.
15. Singh JD, Raju PB, Singh Shamer. Anomalous insertion of Hand Lumbricals. J Anat Soc India 1975; 24(3): 122-5.
