Predicted Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2MAX) Values Obtained During The Maximal Treadmill Test Using Different Protocols
VO2MAX Values During The Maximal Treadmill Test Using Different Protocols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i2.2167Keywords:
Endurance testing, Ramp protocol, Regression equation,VO2MAX,,Treadmill protocolAbstract
Background: VO2MAX is the sole major criterion for endurance assessment. By using the regression equation the necessity of the sophisticated gas analyzer is eliminated. The usability and applicability of such equations are questioned due to non-uniformity, standardization and other variables. Methods: 100 healthy young male subjects were recruited and each performed all the four selected treadmill protocol viz. Bruce, Modified Bruce, Ellestad and Balke. VO2MAX was calculated for each person for each protocol by using regression equation. Results: Mean and SD values of VO2MAX of each protocol were, Balke (41.94 ± 2.15), Bruce (64.55 ± 6.7), Ellestad (61.17 ± 7.5), Modified Bruce (64.36 ± 5.4). There was difference among different protocols (p<0.05), except between Bruce and Modified Bruce (p>0.05). These were compared with ACSM predicted equation based on age and height (51.5+7.4). Later Paired t-test was applied. There is no statistically significant difference between the Bruce and Modified Bruce protocols. Highest difference was observed between the Balke and Bruce protocol and between Balke and Modified Bruce, as was the difference between Balke and Ellestad protocol. Conclusion: For endurance testing Ellestad protocol can be a suitable option in resource crunch settings as the Balke protocol underestimates and Bruce overestimates the VO2MAX. Devising a ramp protocol for the population subset’s need can be the best option.
References
2. Davies B, Daggett A, Jakeman P And Mulhall J: Maximum Oxygen Uptake Utilizing Different Treadmill Protocols;Br J Sports Med 1984 18: 74-79.
3. Myers J, Walsh D, Sullivan M, Froelicher V: Effect Of Sampling On Variability And Plateau In Oxygen Uptake; J Applphysiol 1990; 68:404–10.
4. Porszaszj, Casaburi R, Somfaya,. Woodhouse Lj, And Whipp Bj:A Treadmill Ramp Protocol Using Simultaneous Changes In Speed And Grade; Official Journal Of American College Of Sports Medicine.1596-1603
5. Acsm's Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment Manual 2009.
6. Prampero Pe, Salvadego D, Fusi S And Grass B:A Simple Method For Assessing The EnergyCost Of Running During Incremental Tests J Applphysiol107:1068-1075, 2009.
7. Polleck Et Al.: Physiological Response Of Med 49-65 Years Of Age To Endurance Training. Journal Of The American Geriatric Society (1976) 24, P. 97-104
8. Uth N, Sørensen H, Overgaard K, Pedersen Pk:Estimation Of Vo2max From The Ratio Between Hrmax And Hrrest--The Heart Rate Ratio Method.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Jan;93(4):508-9.
9. Pollock Ml, Bohannon Rl, Cooper Kh, Ayres Jj, Ward A, White Sr, And Linnerud Ac: A Comparative Analysis Of Four Protocols For Maximal Treadmill Stress Testing; American Heart Journal Volume 92, Issue 1, July 1976, Pages 39-46.
10. Mays Rj:A Comparison Of Practical Assessment Methods To Determine Treadmill, Cycle, And Elliptical Ergometer Vo2 Peak;J Strength Cond Res - 01-May-2010; 24(5): 1325-31
11. Balady Gj, Berra Ka, Golding La, Editors :Acsm’s Guidelines For Exercise Testing And Prescription.; 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000
12. Froelicher Vf, Brammell H, Daoisg, Ms, Noguera Z, Stewarta And Laneastermc:A Comparison Of The Reproducibility And Physiologic Response To The Maximal Treadmill Exercise Protocols; Chest 1974;65;512-517.
13. Fabermj, Foster C, Greanyj, Wrightg, Allenbk And Porcarijp: Comparison Of Bruce And Modified Bruce Treadmill Protocols;Journal Of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation & Prevention.September/October 2005 - Volume 25 - Issue 5 - P 290
14. Silvaob, Filho Dc: A New Proposal to Guide Velocity and Inclination in the Ramp Protocol for the Treadmill Ergometer:Arq Bras Cardiol2003, volume 81 , 48-53.
