The Acceptance Rate Of Contraception

The Acceptance Rate Of Contraception

Authors

  • Jagdish T Gohil
  • Shonali N Agarwal
  • Dolly Kirti Gupta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i2.2150

Keywords:

Pregnancy, Contraception, Acceptance

Abstract

Objectives : To study acceptance rate of contraception after 3 or more pregnancy after 2 live issues. Methods : It is a prospective study of 1321 cases that had third or more pregnancy after having two live issues done over a period of 1 year(01/01/2010 to 31/12/2010) at SSGH, Vadodara. Two groups were included – women who came for the termination of the pregnancy after having two live issues (57.15%) and women who came in the labour room either for delivery or spontaneous abortion. Results : incidence of the study cases was 23.46% with 57.15% cases for termination. 89.63% were from lower socio economic. Mistimed conception was seen in 63.29% cases and the most common reason being negligence of contraception(33.97%) against planned conception in only 36.71%. 64.35% accepted contraception at the time of hospitalization, but 36.73% came for accepting contraception. Conclusion : A small planned family has many advantages. Every pregnancy should be planned and every baby should be wanted. Capsule: The most common reason for unwanted pregnancy is the non use of contraception or contraceptive failure. Unintended and unwanted pregnancies add to population’s burden or the need for pregnancy termination. Every pregnancy should be planned and every baby should be wanted.

References

1. Narendra Singh RK, Ibetombi Devi T, Bidhumukhi Devi Th, Manihar Singh Y, Nonibala Devi Th and Sharat singh N. Acceptability of contraceptive methods among urban eligible couples of Imphal, Manipur. IJCM, 2004; 29(1): 13-17.
2. Sujata K. Murarkar, S. G. Soundale, R.N. Lakade. Study of contraceptive practices and reasons for not accepting contraceptives in rural India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, August 2011; 4(8): 915-916.
3. Biswas AK, Roy A, Biswas R. Adoption of small family norms in a rural community of west Bengal. IJCM, 1994; 19(2-4): 68-71.
4. Sharma AK, Grover V, Agrawal OP, Dubey KK, Sharma S. Pattern of contraceptive use by residents of a village in south Delhi. IJPH, 1997; 41(3): 75-78.
5. Ahmad P, Gaash B, Ahmad M, Ahmad D. Contraceptive methods-Acceptance rates and reasons for non acceptance in rural Kashmir. IJPD, 2008; 5(2).
6. Khan ME, Ghosh Dastidar SK, Sashi Bairathi. Not wanting children yet not practicing family planning-A qualitative assessment. JFW, 1985; 32(3): 3-17.
7. Kansal A, Chandra R, Kandpal SD. Epidemiological correlates of contraceptive prevalence in rural population of Dehradun district. IJCM, 2005; 30(2): 60-62.
8. Pushpa SP, Venkatesh R, Shivaswamy MS. Study of fertility pattern and contraceptive practices in a rural area-A cross sectional study. Indian J.Sci.Technol, 2011; 4(4): 429-431.

Downloads

Published

2013-04-30

How to Cite

Gohil, J. T., Agarwal, S. N., & Gupta, D. K. (2013). The Acceptance Rate Of Contraception: The Acceptance Rate Of Contraception. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 4(2), 60–62. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i2.2150

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)