Cephalofacial Characteristics Of Children Under 6 Years Of Age In East Of Nigeria
Cephalofacial Characteristics of Children Under 6 years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i2.2141Keywords:
Cephalic index, facial index, Eastern-Nigeria, head, faceAbstract
Objectives: The present study aimed at measuring the length and width of the head and face of children under the age of six years in Anambra state, a South Eastern state of Nigeria. Data obtained was used to calculate their respective craniofacial indices. Methods: Four hundred and fifty four children (226 males and 228 females) below the age of six were randomly sampled from pre-nursery and nursery schools. Subjects with signs of deformities or history of head and facial injuries and mental retardations were excluded from the study. Measuring tape and spreading callipers were used to measure the length and width of the head and face. Results: Results indicated that the mean head length and breadth, face length and breadth, cephalic index and facial index did not indicate significant gender differences. Mesocephalic head type was the predominant, accounting for 39.9% of the study population; brachycephalic, dolicocephalic, hyperbrachycephalic heads accounted for 35.9%, 12.1% and 7.7% respectively, while ultrabrachycephalic was the least prevalent (4.4%). The dominant type of face was found to be hypereuryprosopic accounting for about 44.5% of the study population. Euryprosopic, mesoprosopic, and leptoprosopic types of face accounted for 39.2%, 11.2%, and 4% of the sampled population respectively, while the rare type was found to be hyperleptoprosopic with 1.1%. Conclusion: This study indicates no significant gender differences in the craniofacial variables in a cross-section of Nigerian children under 6 years of age. The most prevalent type of head was the mesocephalic type while the most dominant type of face shape was hypereuryprosopic in both male and female subjects.
References
2. Heidari Z, Sagheb H.R.M., Melgahi M.H.N. Morphological evaluation of head and face in 18-25 years old women in Southeast of Iran. J. Med. Sc. 2006; 6: 400-404.
3. Evereklioglu C. S, Doganay H.E, Gunduz A, Tercan M, Balat A, Cumurcu T. craniofacial anthropometry in a Turkish population. Cleft Palate craniofac. J 2002; 39: 208-218.
4. Garba S.H., Human A.I., Mishara I.G. Craniofacial classification of normal newborns in Maiduguri Metropolis, Nigeria. Int. J. Morphol 2008; 26(2):407-410.
5. Golalipour M.J., Admadpour M. The Relationship of Weight and Height, Growth, Race, Parity, Age, and Kind of delivery of Mother. Journal of Quzvin University, 2001; 16:58-64.
6. Safikhani Z., Afzah N., Bordbari H. Determination of anatomical type of head and face in children under six years in Ahwaz, Iran. Acta Medical Iranica, 2007; 45(1):43-45.
7. Soames RW. Skeletal system. In Grays Anatomy. Williams P.L, Bannister L.H, Berry M.M, Collins P, Dayson M, Dussek J.E. Ferguesson M.W.J, (Eds) 38th Edn, Churchill Lvingstone, New york PP: 425-736.
8. Mador E.S, Goncim H.Y, Pam I.C, Mutihir J.T, Adoga G.I, Ogunranti J.O. Cephalic index: A fetal gestational age dependent biometric parameter. Asian J Med Sc 2010; 1: 45-48.
9. Oladipo G.S, Ugboma A, Oyakhire M.O. the circumference interorbital index of Ijaw and Igbo ethnic groups in Nigeria. Internet J Biol Anthropol 2009; Vol. 3
10. Esomonu U.G, Badamasi M.I. cephalic anthropometry of Ndi Igbo of Abia state of Nigeria. Asian J. Sc. Res 2012; DOI: 3923/ajsr.2012.
11. Maina M.B, Shapu Y.C, Garba S.H, Muhammad M.A, Garba A.M, Yaro A.U, Omoniyi O.N. Assessments of cranial capacities in a north-eastern adult Nigerian population. J. applied Sc. 2011; 11: 2662-2665.
12. Danborno B, Nuhu P, Yandev K. Relationship between growth pattern and head dimensions in Nigerian children. Internet J of Biol Anthropol 2008; 2 (1): DOI: 10.5580/a80.
13. Rexhepi A and Meka Vjollka. Cephalofacial Morphological Characteristics of Albanian Kosova Population. Int J Morphol 2008; 26 (4): 935-940.
14. Williams P.L., Warwick R., Dyson M., Bannister L.H. (1988). In : Cranium sexual and racial differences. Gray’s Anatomy 37th Ed, Churchill Livingstone, United Kingdom. Pp. 396-397.
15. Satija A, Kaushal S, Gopichand P.V, Chhabra U. Study of relationship between facial index and gestational age in normal newborns. Nepal Med Coll J 2010; 12 (3): 133-136.
16. Ingerslev C.H, Solow B. sex differences in craniofacial morphology. Acta odontologica Scandinavica 1975; 33 (2): 85-94.
17. Gazi-Coklica V, Muretic Z, Brcici R, Kern J, Milicic A. Craniofacial parameters during growth from the deciduous tpo permanent dentition – a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthondotics 1977; 19: 681-689.
18. Kedici P.S., Dökmez B. Sexual variation in the human face and implication for facial reconstruction. Turkish Journal of Forensic Sciences 2003; 2(1):63-70.
19. Fok TF, Hon KL, So HK, et al. Facial anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese babies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6(3):164-72.
20. Bharati S., Som S., Bharati P., Vasulu T.S. Climate and head form in India. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2001; 13(5):626-634.
21. Mibodi I.K.A., Frahani M.R. Study of normal range of anatomical Dimensions of One-day old newborn by cephalometry. J. Med. Council Islamic Republic of Iran, 1996; 14(1):1-8.
