Variability And Accuracy Of Sahli’s Method In Estimation Of Haemoglobin Concentration
Variability And Accuracy Of Sahli’s Method In Estimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i1.2125Keywords:
Haemoglobin, Sahli’s Method, Haemiglobincyanide Method, DhuleAbstract
Background: Haemoglobin concentration provides information about the status of anaemia in the population. Haemoglobin estimation is the routine and frequently performed screening haematological test of laboratory services. The Type of methods used and sites of collection of blood samples has found to make differences in haemoglobin concentration. The methods used in routine measurement are needed to be adjusted to obtain comparability with the haemiglobincyanide method. So the present study was undertaken with a objective to test the reliability of Sahli’s method in estimation of haemoglobin concentration and standardizing it in district hospital laboratory of Dhule in Maharashtra. Material & Methodology: Haemoglobin concentration (gm/dl) in blood is compared in 173 apparently healthy medical college students within 18 to 23 years age. Results from Sahli’s method were compared to Haemiglobincyanide (HiCN) method within capillary and venous blood of same subjects. Results: Sahli’s method has lower values than Haemiglobincyanide method with mean difference of 0.62gms/dl(95%CI; 0.51 to 0.73, p<0.01) in capillary blood and 1.1gms/dl(95%CI; 0.92 to 1.26, p<0.01) in venous blood. By Sahli’s method’s ability to diagnose anaemia has sensitivity of 83.7% & 90% and specificity of 63.2% & 60.2% in capillary & venous blood respectively. Sahli’s method has significant (p<0.01) positive correlation coefficient in capillary blood & venous blood. Variability of haemoglobin concentration in Sahli’s method is less in capillary blood then venous blood in caparison to HiCN method. Interpretation & conclusion: Sahli’s method had lower values of haemoglobin in capillary and venous blood compared to HiCN method. Haemoglobin concentration was lower in capillary blood than venous blood by both methods. For Accuracy of Sahli’s method the correction factor should be considered to ensure comparability of results with the reference method.
References
2. Lewis SM, Osei-Bimpong A, Bradshaw A. Measurement of haemoglobin as a screening test in general practice. Journal of Medical screening 2004, 11(2):103-105.
3. Practical Haematology. Sr John V Dacie, S M Lewis. Churchill Livingstione (ELBS) 7th Edition, 1991 Pg 37 – 41.
4. Stone JE, Simmons WK, Jutsum PJ, Gurney JM. An evaluation of methods of screening for anaemia. Bull WHO 1984; 62:115-120.
5. Morris SS, et al. Precision, accuracy and reliability of hemoglobin assessment with use of capillary blood. American journal of clinical nutrition. 1999; 69(6): 1243 – 1248.
6. Balasubramaniam P, Malathi A. Comparative study of hemoglobin estimated by Drabkin's and Sahli's methods. J Postgrad Med 1992;38(1):8-9.
7. Mills AF, Meadowst N. Screening for anemia: evaluation of a hemoglobinometer. Archives of Disease in childhood, 1998, 64:1468-1471.
8. Barduagni P, Ahmed A S, Curtale F, Raafat M, Soliman L. Performance of Sahli’s and Color scale method in diagnosing anaemia among school children in low prevalence areas. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2003; 8(7): 615–618.
9. Shrinivasan NM, Kasturba MP. Intra-operative point of care haemoglobin estimation: A comparison of three methods. Shri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology.2010; 18(1):15 – 19.
10. International council for standardization in Haematology: Expert panel on haemoglobinometry. Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1995) and specifications for international haemiglobincyanide standard (4th edition). J Clin Pathol 1996; 49: 271-74.
11. Anemia Detection Methods in Low-Resource Settings: A Manual for Health Workers. December 1997. Path. U.S. Agency for International Development. WWW: http://www.path.org. Pg 32-44.
12. Morris SS, et al. Precision, accuracy and reliability of hemoglobin assessment with use of capillary blood. American journal of clinical nutrition. 1999; 69(6): 1243 – 1248.
13. Khan A I, Vasquez Y, Gray J, Wians F H, Kroll M H. The Variability of results between point of care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2006; 130(10): 1527 -1532.
14. Kapil U, Tandon M, Pathak P, Dwived SV. Comparison of hemoglobin values obtained by Hemocue and Sahli's methods. Indian Journal of Public Health.2002; 46(1): 28-30.
