Clinical Significance Of Occurrence Of Osteophytes and Its Effect On Sagittal Diameter Of The Cervical Spinal Canal In Indian Population: Morphometric And Radiological Analysis Of Cervical Spinal Canal
Clinical Significance Of Occurrence Of Osteophytes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v3i2.2014Keywords:
Cervical spinal canal, cervical spondylosis, dysphagia, morphometry, osteophyteAbstract
Backgroud: Osteophyte occurrence in cervical vertebral column is leading cause of cervical spondylosis. The aim of the present study was to estimate the average anatomical changes in cervical vertebral column due to occurrence of osteophytes and changes in the sagittal diameters of the cervical vertebral canal in Indian population to establish a clue to the underlying causes of the neck pain of unknown etiology. Methods: We dissected the cervical part of the vertebral column of 50 human adult cadavers (25 males and 25 females) and obtained 200 plain X-rays of lateral view of cervical spine of living patients (100 males and 100 females) for both morphometric and radiological analyses. Results: We found posterior osteophytes more frequently than anterior. The highest frequency of posterior osteophytes was found in the fifth cervical vertebra and of anterior osteophytes in the sixth cervical vertebra. The mean sagittal diameter of the cervical vertebral canal of cadavers ranged from 29.6 mm at C1 to 15.2 mm at C7 in males and 26.6 mm at C1 to 14.5 mm at C7 in females. The mean sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal in lateral radiograph of the cervical spine were ranged from 20.7 mm at C1 to 14.4 mm at C7 in males and from 19.9 mm at C1 to 13.4 mm at C7 in females. In general the sagittal diameters in female were less than that of male at all vertebral levels. The canal-body ratio at all vertebral levels was found to be less than 0.8 and was significant to develop cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Conclusion: This study has shown the effects of occurrence of osteophytes in cervical vertebra column and its impact on cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
References
2. Epstein JA, Carras R, Epstein BS, Levine LS. Myelopathy in cervical spondylosis with vertebral subluxation and hyperlordosis. J Neurosurg. 1970; 32(4):421-426.
3. Hayashi H, Okada K, Hashimoto J, Tada K, Ueno R. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the aged patient. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine and etiologic factors of myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(6):618-625.
4. Oppenheimer A. Calcification and ossification of vertebral ligaments (sponsylitis ossificans ligamentosa): Roentgen study of pathogenesis and clinical significance. Radiology. 1942; 38: 160-173.
5. Vito DJ. Cervical osteophytic dysphagia: single and combined mechanisms. Dysphagia. 1998; 13(1): 58-61.
6. Wolf BS, Khilnani M and Malis L. The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J. Mt Sinai Hosp N Y. 1956; 23(3): 283-292.
7. Payne EE, Spillane JD. The cervical spine: An anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1957; 80(4): 571-596.
8. Burrows EH. The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin Radiol. 1963; 14: 77-86.
9. Bhalla SP, Lall SK, Sodhi JS, Negi ON. Comparative values of intervertebral space, spinal canal and intervertebral foramina in normal and in cases of cervical spondylosis in Indian population. Indian Journal of Radiology. 1977; 31: 170-175.
10. Johnbull TO, Anibeze CIP. A Cadaveric Study of the Morphometry of the Cervical Spinal Canal in Nigerians. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy. 2009; 8: 19-21.
11. Lee MJ, Cassinelli EH, Riew KD. Prevalence of cervical spine stenosis: anatomic study in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):376–380.
12. Oon CL. The sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal. Singapore Medical Journal. 1974; 15(3): 218-222.
13. Edwards WC, LaRocca H. The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine. 1983; 8(1):20–27.
14. Torg JS, Pavlov H, Genuario SE et al. Neurapraxia of the cervical spinal cord with transient quadriplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(9):1354-1370.
15. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C. Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology. 1987; 164(3): 771–775.
16. Castro FP, Ricciardi J, Brunet ME, Busch MT, Whitecloud TS III: Stingers, the Torg ratio, and the cervical spine. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25(5):603–608.
