A Study of Anaerobic Organisms in Clinically Suspected Cases of Anaerobic Infections
A Study of Anaerobic Organisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v3i2.1984Keywords:
Bacteroids fragilis, Prevotella melaninogenicusAbstract
Background: Anaerobes are microorganisms grow in tissue with reduced oxidation-reduction potentials, predisposing to infection in absence of oxygen. Most of anaerobic infection occurs when a patient’s normal flora gains access to a sterile site as a result of disruption of some anatomical barrier. Moreover, most anaerobic infections involve a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic organisms, so failure of treatment occurs because of mixed infections with both type of bacteria. The aim of study was to isolate and identify anaerobic bacteria in clinically suspected pure anaerobic infection and mixed infection. Also to know antibiotic sensitivity pattern of anaerobes for better treatment of clinical failure cases. Method: Different samples for culture collected either by biopsy or by aspiration using sterile needle and syringe. Anaerobic transport medium was used for sample collected on swab. Liquid anaerobic medium like Thioglycolate medium, Robertson cooked meet medium and solid anaerobic media like Blood agar with antibiotics, hemin, Vit. K, Bacteroides bile esculin agar and Kanamycin- Vancomycin blood agar were used for cultivation. COMPACT TG Anaerobic work station was used for providing oxygen free atmosphere for growth of anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes isolated in 68(62.96%) out of total 108 samples from different pyogenic lesions of patient admitted in various wards of Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad during April 1998 to Dec. 1999. Result: B. fragilis and P. melaninogenicus were commonest isolate 21(35%) and 23(38.33%) respectively. Metronidazole (93%) and clinamycin(73%) were effective drugs for anaerobic bacteria. 58 samples(53.70%) were positive for both aerobes and anaerobes indicating synergisms for infection between these bacteria.
References
microbiology, 5th edition, ch.29, page 245-249,1997.
2. Baily and Scott’s : Processing clinical specimen for anaerobic bacteria , Isolation and Identification procedure, in Bailey and Scott’s methods for identification of etiological agents of infectious disease, ch.35, page 474-500, 1994.
3. Usha gupta et al.: “Anaerobic bacteria isolated from pyogenic lesionsâ€, Ind. J. Med. Research, 60,nov. 1972, page 1557-1563.
4. J.G. collee and W. Marr: “Culture of Bacteriaâ€, Mackie and MacCartney, Practical medical microbiology, 14th edi., ch. 6, page 116-120, 1996.
5. Beena V. K. Shivananda, P. G. : “Antibiogram of Bacteroides fragilis group isolated from clinical specimens.†Indian J. Med. Micro., vol. 10, no. 4, page 231-234, 1992.
6. Jindal et al. : “Anaerobic bacteremiasâ€, Indian J. Med. Micro., vol 11, no. 1, page 47-50, 1993
7. Reena et al. : “Prevlence of Anaerobic bacteria in pyogenic infections†Ind. J. of Med. Micro., vol. 15, no.3, page 121-123, july 1997.
8. Thangam Menon and S. Subramanian : “Bacteriology and serology of anaerobic surgical sepsisâ€, Ind. J. of Surgery, May-June 1989.
9. Mitchell et al. : “Incidence and isolation of Bacteroids species from clinical material and their sensitivity to antibioticsâ€, J. clino. Patho. 26, 7380741, 1973.
10. Finegold S M , Martha A C E, and Diane M C: “General consideration “ in Wads worth anaerobic Bacteriology manual, 4th edi. Ch 1 Page 1-5, 1986.
11. Itzhak Brock :â€Bacteroides infection†Drug, Diseases and Procedure, July, 2011, 22.
12. Lassmann B; Gustafson DR; Wood CM ; Rosenblatt JE: “Reemergence of anaerobic bacteremiaâ€, Clin Infect, Dis, 2007,44(7):895-900.
13. Serpil Ercis, Fedra Tunckanat, Gulsen Hascelik : “Anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with suspected anaerobic infection†Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni, volume 39, Issue 4, page 447-454, 2005.
14. Kazue Ueno, Naoki Kato, Haru Kato :†The status of Research on Anaerobes in Japanâ€, Clin. Infect. Dis. 35, supplement 1, 554-557, 2002.
