A Study on Curriculum Preferences of I M.B.B.S Students In A Government Medical College In Maharashtra
A Study on Curriculum Preferences of I M.B.B.S Students In A Government Medical College In Maharashtra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i3.1260Keywords:
Curriculum, PreferenceAbstract
Introduction: MBBS course content has increased enormously owing to newer discoveries, emerging diseases and technological advances etc., but removal of redundant and obsolete content from the textbooks has never been done. University, Government and medical councils are now thinking of changing this situation. The importance of obtaining student perception about the existing system before advocating any change is very important. In view of this need students’ preferences and inclinations about I MBBS curriculum and Physiology content were obtained. Methodology: This is an observational study conducted by administering a questionnaire in ShriVasantraoNaik, Govt. Medical College, Yavatmal, from September 2015 to December 2015, on 130 II MBBS students. Results: Majority i.e. 107 (82.3%) students preferred duration of I MBBS course, to be one year.Most i.e. 75(57.7%) students liked Anatomy and in Physiology, CVS was the most preferred system by 43(33% ) students.51 students (39.2% ) preferred blood as system to be taught first. Conclusion: The present study gives a guideline regarding preferences of I MBBS students about their curriculum with emphasis on contents of Physiology as a subject and to some extent, the way it is taught. [Shilpa G NJIRM 2017; 8(3):127-129]
References
2. Siddiqui, A. (2006) The changing shape of teaching physiology in south Asia: problems and prospects, ActaPhysiologicaHungarica, 93, 1, pp. 91–98.
3. Prideaux, D. (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: curriculum design, British MedicalJournal, 326, pp. 268-270.
4. Gitanjali, B. &Shashindran, C. H. (2006) Formulating a curriculum in clinical pharmacology for medical undergraduate students in India, Indian Journal ofPharmacology, 38, Suppl 2, pp. S105-S107.
5. Valle, R., Alaminos, I., Contreras, E., Salas, L. E., Tomasini, P. & Varela, M. (2004) Student questionnaire to evaluate basic medical science teaching (METEQ-B), RevistaMédicadel IMSS, 42, 5, pp. 405-411.
6. Tufts, M. A. & Higgins-Opitz, S. B. (2009) What makes the learning of physiology in a PBL medical curriculum challenging? Student perceptions, Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 3, pp. 187-195.
7. Lata, H., Walia, L. & Gupta, V. (2008) Student feedback on teaching and evaluation methodology in physiology, South East Asian Journal ofMedical Education, 2, 1 , pp. 31-37.
8. Lujan, H. L. &DiCarlo, S. E. (2006) First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles, Advances in Physiology Education, 30, pp. 13– 16.
9. Garg, A., Rataboli, P. V. &Muchandi, K. (2004) Students’ opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended, Indian Journal ofPharmacology, 36, 3, pp. 155-158.
10. MI Ebomoyi and F D Agoreyo. Preclinical students’ perceptions of their courses and preclinical specialty choice,Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research, Vol. 6, No. 1 & 2, December 2007, pp. 47-58
11. OmnaChawlaet. al.Students’ perspective of the MBBS Physiology curriculum,Southâ€East Asian Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 6 no. 2, 2012
12. Florence Lalvarmawi et al. Feedback on teaching and evaluation methodology in Physiology,National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology, 2015. Vol 5. Issue 1, pp. 36 – 38
