To Determine the Effectiveness of Case Based Tutorials As Compared To Traditional Tutorials in Microbiology
Effectiveness Of Case Based Tutorials As Compared To Traditional Tutorials In Microbiology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v7i2.1157Keywords:
Case based learning, Tutorials,Microbiology educationAbstract
Background& Objective: In traditional lecture classes or tutorials students are passive learners, so it is just
factual recalling than the reasoning. In case based learning, students take an active part in the discussion and
develop a skill for interaction. To test for the effectiveness of Case Based Tutorials (CBL) as compared to traditional
tutorials in microbiology. Methodology: A total of 58 students were divided into Batch A and Batch B randomly. Case
Based Tutorials was conducted for batch A, and while to batch B traditional tutorials were conducted. Pre test and
post test were conducted for both the batches and results were analyzed by unpaired t test. Feedback on CBL
sessions was recorded on a pre validated questionnaire. Results: There was significant difference in the knowledge
gained by the students as their performance in post test of Case Based tutorial was better as compared to Traditional
Tutorial ( P <0.001). 27 (93.10%) students opined that CBL improved their learning skills. Conclusion: CBL can
enhance the development of learning skills and can be used for early clinical exposure and better application of
microbiology in diagnosis & patient care. [Patil MNJIRM2016; 7(2):5-8]
References
Active learning and student centered pedagogy
Improve student attitudes and performance in
introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 2009;8:203-
13.
2. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM,
MacDougall C, Matthews P, et al. The
effectiveness of case-based learning in health
professional education. A BEME systematic review:
BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach 2012; 34:e421–4.
3. Tayem IY. The Impact of Small Group Case-based
Learning on Traditional Pharmacology Teaching.
Sultan Qaboos University Med J 2013;13:115-120.
4. Engel FE and Hendricson WD. A case-based
learning model in orthodontics. J Dental Educ
1994; 58:762–7.
5. Williams B. Case based learning: A review of the
literature: Is there scope for this educational
paradigm in prehospital education? Emerg Med J
2005; 22:577–81.
6. Srivastava TK, Waghmare LS. Interactive intragroup
tutorials: A modification to suit the
challenges of Physiology tutorial in Rural Medical
Schools. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2014;
4:128-131.
7. Goldbloom RB, Jones GM. The role of a Tutorial
System in Undergraduate Medical Education. Can
Med Assoc J. 1967;96(14):1027-31.
8. Puay WK. ‘Divide and Conquer’: Breaking a Big
Class into Small Teams for Tutorials. CDTL Brief
2006;9:1-2.
9. Ciraj A.M, Vinod.P, Ramnarayan K. Enhancing
active learning in microbiology through case based
learning: Experiences from an Indian medical
school. Indian Journal of Pathology and
Microbiology 2010;53(4):729-33.
10. Hansen JT, Krackov SK. The use of small group
case-based exercises in human gross anatomy: A
method for introducing active learning in a
traditional course format. Clinical Anatomy
1994;7(6):357-6.
11. Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T
and Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning
with case-based learning: effects of a major
curricular shift at two institutions. Acad Med 2007;
82:74–82.
12. Petress K. What is meant by active learning?
Education 2008;128: 566–9.
13. Visschers-Pleijers AJ, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH,
van der Vleuten. Exploration of a method to
analyze group interactions in problem-based
learning. Med Teach. 2004;26(5):471-8.
14. Latif R. Impact of case-based lectures on
students’ performance in vascular physiology
module. Adv Physiol Educ 2014; 38: 268–72.
15. Blewett EL and Kisamore JL. Evaluation of an
interactive, case-based review session in teaching
medical microbiology. BMC Medical Education
2009; 9:56.
16. Suryavanshi S, Tawalare K. Comparative study of
case based learning to traditional teaching method
in the students of third BAMS. JETHS 2014;1; 41-8.
