Comparison Of Objective Structured Practical Examination To Conventional Practical Examination In Microbiology.
Comparison Of Objective Structured Practical Examination To Conventional Practical Examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v7i5.1149Keywords:
Assessment, Gram stain, Microbiology, OSPE, Zeihl- Neelsen stainAbstract
Background & Objectives: Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is a good tool to assess skill competency. The objectives of the study was to compare the score of marks obtained by Conventional method of assessment (CPE) with OSPE for assessing skill competency to perform Gram and Zeihl- Neelsen stain and to know the students’ and teachers’ perception about OSPE. Methods: Ninety two MBBS students were included in the study as ‘OSPE’ and ‘CPE’ groups (46+46). The two groups were assessed for their skill competency to perform Gram and Zeihl- Neelsen stain using OSPE and CPE methods respectively. Teachers’ perception was analysed for both the assessment methods with respect to objectivity, reliability, validity, feasibility etc. Feedback was taken from students too. Results: The difference of marks score by OSPE and CPE was found to be extremely statistically significant. The perception (students’ & teachers’ ) assessment reflected the acceptability of the method among students and teachers. Interpretation & Conclusion: OSPE is a tool which would help increase the objectivity while assessing skills in Microbiology and needs to be evaluated further so as to enable teachers to use this valuable tool alone or in combination with CPE.[Namrata K NJIRM 2016; 7(5):87-91]
References
2. Prideaux D, Young LE, Carroll RG. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Curricular design. BMJ 2003;326:268–70.
3. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010;32(8):676–82.
4. Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: applying educational theory in practice. BMJ 2003;326:213–16.
5. Al-Wardy NM. Assessment methods in undergraduate medical education. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2010;10(2):203–09.
6. Piyush G, Pooja D, Tejinder S. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Revisited. Med edu 2010; 47: 911-20.
7. Naik SA, Prathab AG , Indumathi VA. Objective Structured Practical Examination as a tool for evaluating competency in Gram staining. J Edu Resea Med Teach 2013;1(1):48-50.
8. Van der Vleuten C. The assessment of professional competence : developments, research and practical implications Advances in Health Science Education 1996;1: 41-67.
9. Harden RM, Stevenson M, WDownie W, Wilson GM. Assesment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.Br Med J 1975;1:447-51.
10. Nayar U, Malik SL, Bijlani R.L. Objective structured practical examination : a new concept in assessment of laboratory exercises in preclinical sciences. Med Educ. 1986;20(3):204-09.
11. Kundu D, Das HN, Sen G, Osta M, Mandal T, Gautam D. Objective structured practical examination in Biochemistry: An experience in Medical College, Kolkata. J Nat Sci Biol Med.2013;4(1):103-07.
12. Sudhir K, Ashish R, Govind K, Amit M, Dipankar B. Assessment of undergraduate medical students using Objective Structured Clinical Examination in General Medicine: student’s and teacher’s perception. Journ Evol Med Dent Sc. 2015;4(99):16481-84.
13. Barman A. Critiques on the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2005;34:478-82.
14. Wani PD, Dalvi VS. Objective Structured Practical Examination vs. Traditional Clinical Examination in Human Physiology: Student’s perception. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2(3): 543-47.
15. Wani PD, Kini S, Dalvi V. Objective Structured Practical Examination v/s Traditional Clinical Examination in Human Physiology: Faculty’s perception. Int J Bas Appl Physio 2012;1(1):30-35
