Hematology OSPE In The First Year MBBS Curriculum - A Feasibility And Acceptability Study -
Hematology OSPE In The First Year MBBS Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v6i5.970Keywords:
OSPE, Hematology, feasibility, acceptability, first year MBBSAbstract
Background and Objectives: The use of OSPE (Objective Structured Practical Examination) for formative assessment has great potential as the learners can gain insight into the elements making up their competencies as well as ongoing feedback on personal strengths and weaknesses. The first year MBBS students are required to perform one hematology practical during university exams (Maharashtra University of Health Sciences). One of the important practical, Differential Leucocyte Count (DLC), was therefore chosen to introduce the OSPE pattern in hematology assessment and study its acceptability and feasibility. Methodology: The study was conducted in the Department of Physiology. 100 students were introduced to OSPE by a short lecture and a role play. Seven important steps (skills) of the DLC practical were assessed. Feedback from students was taken by a questionnaire and from faculty members and laboratory assistant by interview. Results: More than 90% of the students accepted OSPE in terms of learning the steps of the practical, clinical relevance and fairness in assessment. However, majority of students felt that the physical and mental effort needed was greater. The faculty commented favourably on the objectivity of assessment and potential to give feedback to learners and the support staff commented on greater workload and time needed for OSPE. Conclusion: Our study showed a high acceptability among students and faculty towards OSPE as a fair, objective and unbiased method of assessment compared to traditional method. The resources required, however, were greater. The study highlighted a need for continuous faculty development and increase in human resources to develop a comprehensive OSPE bank in future [Bhinganiya P NJIRM 2015; 6(5):71-75]
References
2. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979; 13(1): 41–54.
3. Harden RM. What is an OSCE? Med Teacher 1988; 10(4): 19-22.
4. Harden RM, Stevenson M, Wilson DW, Wilson GM. Assessment of clinical competencies using objective structured clinical examination. Br Med J 1975; 1(5955): 447–451.
5. Harden RM. How to assess clinical competence: an overview. Med Teacher 1979; 1(8): 289-96.
6. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/ competence/ performance. Acad Med 1990; 65(9 Suppl): S63-7.
7. Bijlani RL. Assessment of laboratory exercises in Physiology. Med Educ 1981; 15(4): 216-21.
8. MCI. Vision 2015. Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Education. New Delhi: MCI; March 2011.
9. Kundu D, Das HN, Sen G, Osta M, Mandal T, Gautam D. Objective structured practical examination in Biochemistry: An experience in Medical College, Kolkata. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013; 4(1): 103-7
10. Hungund B, Patil S, Joshi A, Gosavi M, Bannur H, Mallapur M. Objective Structured Practical Assessment and Feedback( OSPAF) as a Teaching Tool for Learning Pathology for Medical Students: A Control Trial. Ind J of Appl Res 2015; 5(1): 505-8
11. Newble DI. Eight years experience with a structured clinical examination. Med Educ 1988; 22(3): 200-4.
12. Duffield KE, Spencer JA. A survey of medical students' views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Med Educ 2002; 36(9): 879-86.
13. Manjula A, Shashikala P, Nagraj P. Students’ perception on objective structured practical examination in Pathology. J Med Education and Res. 2013; 1(1): 12-14
14. Allen R, Heard J, Savidge M, Bittergle J, Cantrell M, Huffmaster T. Surveying Students' Attitudes During the OSCE. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1998; 3(3): 197-206.
15. Duerson MC, Romrell LJ, Stevens CB. Impacting faculty teaching and student performance: nine years' experience with the objective structured clinical examination. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12(4): 176-82.
