Osseointegration for Dental Implants : An Overview
Osseointegration For Dental Implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v6i3.924Keywords:
Amalgam, radiation, needle prick, awareness, biomedical wasteAbstract
On-going research will allow discrimination between those systems that really osseointegrate predictably and those that do this irregularly. Long term maintenance of dental implants is gaining importance as the main factor affecting the long term prognosis of dental implants. Patients should be well instructed in maintaining oral hygiene around the dental implants. A lot of implant cleansing aids are more widely available in line with the growing demand of dental implants. The presence of attached gingiva is being recognised as important for the maintenance of good oral hygiene in reducing the incidence of periodontal disease around the implants. [Nasiha F et al NJIRM 2015; 6(3):105-112]
References
2. Ritman EL, Bolander ME, Fitzpatrick LA, Turner RT. Micro-CT imaging of structure-to-function relationship of bone microstructure and associated vascular involvement. Technol Health Care. 1998;6(5–6):403–412.
3. Sela J, Gross UM, Kohavi D, et al. Primary mineralization at the surfaces of implants. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(4):423–436.
4. Behari J. Elements of bone biophysics. In: Behari J. Biophysical Bone Behaviour: Principles and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009:1–52.
5. Ross FP, Christiano AM. Nothing but skin and bone.J Clin Invest. 2006;116(5):1140–1149.
6. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Hirschwald[The Law of Bone Remodeling]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1892. German.
7. Skedros JG, Baucom SL. Mathematical analysis of trabecular ‘trajectories’ in apparent
trajectorial structures: the unfortunate histori-cal emphasis on the human proximal femur. J Theor Biol. 2007;244(1): 15–45.
8. Carl E. MischContemporary Implant Dentistry.3rd ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2008.
9. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(1):101–107.
10. Rafel SS. Temperature changes during high-speed drilling on bone. J Oral SurgAnesthHosp Dent Serv. 1962;20:475–477.
11. Ling RS.Observations on the fixation of implants to the bony skeleton.ClinOrthopRelat Res. 1986;(210):80–96.
12. Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lang NP. Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(3):313–318.
13. Rae T. The toxicity of metals used in orthopaedic prostheses. An experimental study using cultured human synovial fibroblasts.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(3):435–440.
14. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants.Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.ActaOrthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–170.
15. Rae T. Comparative laboratory studies on the production of soluble and particulate metal by total joint prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95(1–2):71–79.
16. AginsHJ, Alcock NW, Bansal M, et al. Metallic wear in failed titanium-alloy total hip replacements. A histological and quantitative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(3):347–356.
17. Tummler HP, Thull R, Schaldach M.The mechanism of repassivation and the concentration of corrosion products shown on TIALV. Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 13th International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, and 6th International Conference on Medical Physics; September 5–11, 1982; Hamburg, Germany.
18. Aaron RK, Herr HM, CiomborDM, et al. Horizons in prosthesis development for the restoration of limb function. J Am AcadOrthop Surg. 2006;14(10 Spec No):S198–S204.19. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(4):329–345.
20. Meyer AE, Baier RE, Natiella JR, Meenaghan MA. Investigation of tissue/implant interactions during the first two hours of implantation.J Oral Implantol. 1988;14(3):363–379.
21. Balshe AA, Assad DA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Weaver AL. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(6):1113–1118.
22. Pak HS, Yeo IS, Yang JH. A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics.J AdvProsthodont. 2010;2(4): 142–147.
23. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Mechanisms involved in osteoblast response to implant surface morphology. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2001;31:357–371.
24. Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25(10):1959–1967.
25. Bloebaum RD, BachusKN, Rubman MH, Dorr LD. Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study.J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(2):203–211.
26. Hofmann AA, BachusKN, Bloebaum RD. Comparative study of human cancellous bone remodeling to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants.J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(2):157–166.
27. Bloebaum RD, Mihalopoulus NL, Jensen JW, Dorr LD. Postmortem analysis of bone growth into porous-coated acetabular components.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(7):1013–1022.
28. Albrektsson, T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants.Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1988; 60: 75–84.
29. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387–416.
30. Esposito M, Thomsen P, Ericson LE, Lekholm U, 1999. Histopathologic observations on early
oral implant failures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 14:798-810.
31. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, Lindén U, Lundqvist S, Rundcrantz T, Johansson LA, Nilner K, Billström C, 2001. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 12:462-7.
32. Op Heij DG, Opdebeeck H, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, 2003. Age as compromising factor for implant insertion. Periodontology 2000, 33:172-84.
33. Fiorellini JP, Chen PK, Nevins M, Nevins ML, 2000. A retrospective study of dental implants in diabetic patients. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 20:366-73.
34. Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S, 2000. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointegrated dental implants. Annals of Periodontology, 5:79-89.
35. Jaffin RA, Berman CL, 1991. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 62:2-4.
36. Roberts WE, Simmons KE, Garetto LP, DeCastro RA, 1992. Bone physiology and metabolism in dental implantology: risk factors for osteoporosis and other metabolic diseases. Implant Dentistry, 1:11-21.
37. Monsees TK, Barth K, Tippelt S, et al. Surface patterning on adhesion, differentiation, and orientation of osteoblast-like cells. Cell Tiss Org 2005;180:81–95.
38. Gupta, A.; Dhanraj, M. &Sivagami, G. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview. Indianjournal of dental research 2010;21:433-438.
39. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U.A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and TiO2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001;10:2-7.
40. Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, et al. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with sandblasted and acidetched surface in the canine mandible: Radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:240-52.
41. Misch Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed Mosby .2008. p 614.
42. McCafferty MM, Burke GA, Meenan BJ. Mesenchymal stem cell response to conformal sputter deposited calcium phosphate thin filmson nanostructured titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013 Nov 1. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35018. [Epub ahead of print]
43. CaousJS, Lövenklev M, Fäldt J, Langton M. Adhesion of Streptococcus mitis and Actinomycesoris in co-culture tomachined and anodized titanium surfaces as affected by atmosphere and pH. BMC Oral Health 2013 Jan 8;13:4. doi: 1186/1472-6831-13-4.
44. Herr Y, Woo J, Kwon Y, Park J, Heo S & Chung J. Implant Surface Conditioning with Tetracycline-HCl: A SEM Study. Key Engineering Materials 2008;361:849-852.
45. Vincenzini P, editor: Ceramics in surgery, Amsterdam, 1983, Elsevier.
46. Kou W, Akasaka T, Watari F, Sjögren G. An in vitro evaluation of the biological effects of carbon nanotubecoateddental zirconia. ISRN Dent 2013 August 20;2013:296727. doi: 10.1155/2013/296727.