Postgraduate Formative Assessment: Student Perspective
Postgraduate Formative Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v6i1.860Keywords:
Postgraduate Student, Formative, AssessmentAbstract
Introduction: Assessment drives learning. It serves as a tool for student motivation, retention & transfer of learning. At our institute we have started postgraduate formative assessment as a part of improvement in teaching learning in postgraduate study. Method: Present quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted at Government Medical College, Bhavnagar. During 2013-14, 75, third-year post graduate students of different 20 department of the Government Medical College, Bhavnagar had been assessed in this manner. The instrument (questionnaire) was distributed to all of these students. Result: The majority of students (92.96%) are of opinion that exam was well organised, 90.14% felt that it has gave confidence in them for their subject. More than 85% agreed that formative assessment has motivated them to learn subject more (88.73%) either by stimulating learning (87.32%) or by identifying the deficiencies in learning (85.92%). Regarding content of assessment, students were of opinion that assessment were focused on leaning objective (87.32%) and having broad coverage of subject (85.32%) leading to increase competence in respective subject. Conclusion: Feedback was pivotal in establishing important dialogue between students and teachers, creating a student-supported learning environment. Emphasis has been placed on front loading formative approaches in the first semester to ensure that students actively engage with feedback and act on it to feed forward, and develop transferable and metacognitive skills to facilitate both transition and academic progression. [Dalvani V NJIRM 2015; 6(1):77-80]
References
2. Rowantree D. Assessing students: How shall we know them? London:Kogan; 1974.
3. Marshall JM. Formative assessment: Mapping the road to success. A white paper prepared for the Princeton Review. New York:The Princeton Review; 2005
4. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: the case of research on prior knowledge. Review of educational research, 69 (2), 147-188.
5. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning
environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201-204
6. De Lima AA, Henquin R, Thierer J, Paulin J, et al. A qualitative study of the impact on learning of the mini clinical evaluation exercise in postgraduate training. Medical Teacher. 2005; 27(1):46–52
7. Yorke, M. (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education 45:477-501
8. Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
9. Rushton, A. (2005) Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher 27:509-513.
10. Johnston, B. & Kochanowska, R. (2009) Student Expectations, Experiences and Reflections on the First Year. Glasgow: QAA.
11. Boud, D. (2000) Sustainable assessment: Rethinking for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 22:151 -167.
