Comparative Study of Monopolar Cautery and Bipolar Vessel Sealing System in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparative Study of Monopolar Cautery and Bipolar Vessel Sealing System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i6.829Keywords:
Monopolar cautery, vascular sealing system, laparoscopy, appendectomyAbstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has gradually become widespread especially in the last decade. Although laparoscopic techniques are similar, different instruments, such as endoscopic stapler, endoscopic clip, monopolar hook cautery, harmonic scalpel, and vessel sealing instrument, can be used in appendiceal mesentery dissection 1, 2. BVS is an effective and safe system to be used at the dissection of appendiceal mesentery and haemostasis and is definitely effective in decreasing the operation period. Objectives: The main objective of the present study was to studyretrospectively, the effects of using monopolar cautery and vessel sealing system on the operation period in the appendix mesentery dissection.
Methods: Hundred patients, operated laparoscopically for acute appendicitis in between June 2010 and June 2011, are evaluated retrospectively. Monopolar cautery was used in 50 patients and bipolar vessel sealer was used in 50 patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complication was seen in any of the patients. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery due to dissection problems of the appendiceal mesentery.
Results and Interpretation: The mean duration of operation was 51.08 min in the monopolar cautery group whereas 36.68 minutes in the bipolar vessel sealing system group. Conclusion: Bipolar vessel sealeris safer and time saving as compared toMonopolar cauteryin laparoscopic appendectomy. [Bhadreshwara K NJIRM 2014; 5(6):53-55]
References
2. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ: Laparoscopic appendectomy using the Liga-
Sure Vessel Sealing System. J Laparoend Advan Surg Technique A. 2005; 15: 353-6.
3. Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL.: Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 799 -801.
4. Hope WW, Burns JM, Newcomb WL, Heniford BT, Sing RF.: Safety and efficacy of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in trauma. Injury, 2009; 40: 564–566.
5. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ. : Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 263–9.
6. Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S, Dindo D, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D : Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. British J Surgery 2008; 95: 1098–1104.
7. Lantis JC II, Durville FM, Connolly R, Schwaitzberg SD: Comparison of coagulation modalities in surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998; 8: 381– 94.
8. Ata AH, Bellemore TJ, Meisel JA, Arambulo SM: Distal thermal injury from monopolar electrosurgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3: 323–7.
9. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, Collyer W et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 2003; 169: 697-700.
10. Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford BT.: Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov. 2008;
