Laboratory Diagnosis Of Malaria-Various Method And It’s Comparision
Laboratory Diagnosis Of Malaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i3.538Keywords:
Laboratory Diagnosis, Method, malariaAbstract
This is a comparative review of various techniques used for the detection of various malarial species, it’s specificity, sensitivity and availability at tertiary care center with its cost effectiveness.
References
1. B S Kakkilaya. Malaria site all about malaria.[internet] available from
http:// www.malariasite.com. [accessed 20th September 2012]
2. Monica cheesbrough-District Laboratoty Practice in Tropical Countries, Part-1,.Cambridge university press.1998. p. 249-250.
3. Adeoye GO, Nga IC. Comparison of Quantitative Buffy Coat technique (QBC) with Giemsa-stained thick film (GTF) for diagnosis of malaria. Parasitology International [internet] 2007;56(4):308-312.Available from htpp:// europepmc.org/abstract/MED/17683979 [accessed 20th September 2012]
4. Cabezos J, Bada JL. The diagnosis of malaria by the thick film and the QBC: a comparative study of both technics. Med Clin (Barc) [internet]1993;101:91-4. Available from http://pubget.com/paper/8315991. [accessed 20th September 2012]
5. Pinto MJ, Rodrigues SR, Desouza R, Verenkar MP. Usefulness of quantitative buffy coat blood parasite detection system in diagnosis of malaria. Indian J Med Microbiol [internet] 2001;19:219-21. Available from At http://www.ijmm.org. [accessed 20th September 2012]
6. Estacio RH, Edwin RE, Cresswell S, Coronel RF, Alora AT. The Quantitative Buffy Coat Technique (QBC) in Early Diagnosis of Malaria: The Santo Tomas University Hospital Experience. Available Athttp://psmid.org.ph/vol22/vol22num2topic3.pdf [accessed 20th September 2012]
7. Wang X, Zhu S, Liu Q, Hu A, Zan Z, Yu Q, Yin Q. Field evaluation of the QBC technique for rapid diagnosis of vivax malaria. Bull World Health Organ.[internet]. 1996;74(6):599-603. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2486804 [accessed 20th September 2012]
8. Hanscheid T, Melo-Cristino J, Pinto BG. Automated detection of malaria pigment in white blood cells for the diagnosis of malaria in Portugal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 May-Jun;64(5-6):290-2
9. Ben-Ezra J, St. Louis M, Riley RS. Automated malarial detection with the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol. 2001;7:61-64
10. Kramer B, Grobusch MP, Suttorp N et al. Relative frequency of malaria pigment-carrying monocytes of nonimmune and semi-immune patients from flow cytometric depolarized side scatter. Cytometry. 2001 Oct 1;45(2):133-40.
11. Demirev PA, Feldman AB, Kongkasuriyachai D et al. Detection of malaria parasites in blood by laser desorption mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2002 Jul 15;74(14):3262-6
12. Mann M. Mass tool for diagnosis. Nature 2002 Aug 15;418(6899):731-32
http:// www.malariasite.com. [accessed 20th September 2012]
2. Monica cheesbrough-District Laboratoty Practice in Tropical Countries, Part-1,.Cambridge university press.1998. p. 249-250.
3. Adeoye GO, Nga IC. Comparison of Quantitative Buffy Coat technique (QBC) with Giemsa-stained thick film (GTF) for diagnosis of malaria. Parasitology International [internet] 2007;56(4):308-312.Available from htpp:// europepmc.org/abstract/MED/17683979 [accessed 20th September 2012]
4. Cabezos J, Bada JL. The diagnosis of malaria by the thick film and the QBC: a comparative study of both technics. Med Clin (Barc) [internet]1993;101:91-4. Available from http://pubget.com/paper/8315991. [accessed 20th September 2012]
5. Pinto MJ, Rodrigues SR, Desouza R, Verenkar MP. Usefulness of quantitative buffy coat blood parasite detection system in diagnosis of malaria. Indian J Med Microbiol [internet] 2001;19:219-21. Available from At http://www.ijmm.org. [accessed 20th September 2012]
6. Estacio RH, Edwin RE, Cresswell S, Coronel RF, Alora AT. The Quantitative Buffy Coat Technique (QBC) in Early Diagnosis of Malaria: The Santo Tomas University Hospital Experience. Available Athttp://psmid.org.ph/vol22/vol22num2topic3.pdf [accessed 20th September 2012]
7. Wang X, Zhu S, Liu Q, Hu A, Zan Z, Yu Q, Yin Q. Field evaluation of the QBC technique for rapid diagnosis of vivax malaria. Bull World Health Organ.[internet]. 1996;74(6):599-603. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2486804 [accessed 20th September 2012]
8. Hanscheid T, Melo-Cristino J, Pinto BG. Automated detection of malaria pigment in white blood cells for the diagnosis of malaria in Portugal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 May-Jun;64(5-6):290-2
9. Ben-Ezra J, St. Louis M, Riley RS. Automated malarial detection with the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol. 2001;7:61-64
10. Kramer B, Grobusch MP, Suttorp N et al. Relative frequency of malaria pigment-carrying monocytes of nonimmune and semi-immune patients from flow cytometric depolarized side scatter. Cytometry. 2001 Oct 1;45(2):133-40.
11. Demirev PA, Feldman AB, Kongkasuriyachai D et al. Detection of malaria parasites in blood by laser desorption mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2002 Jul 15;74(14):3262-6
12. Mann M. Mass tool for diagnosis. Nature 2002 Aug 15;418(6899):731-32
Downloads
Published
2013-06-30
How to Cite
Mehta, D., & Desai, N. (2013). Laboratory Diagnosis Of Malaria-Various Method And It’s Comparision: Laboratory Diagnosis Of Malaria. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 4(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i3.538
Issue
Section
Review Article
