Study of Management in Patient with Ectopic Pregnancy
Study of Management In Patient with Ectopic Pregnancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v2i3.1928Keywords:
Ectopic Pregnancy, Conservative, ManagementAbstract
Background: ectopic pregnancy has always challenged ingenuity of the Obstratrition and Gynaecologist by its bizarre clinical picture. If it is not attended in time, it may lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. It is one, which can mimic practically each and every gynaecological disorder as well as many surgical catastrophes Method: The present study consist of 60 cases of ectopic pregnancy from may 2007to September 2009 admitted at department of obstetrics and Gynaecology at our hospital. All data was collected in to pre designed structured Performa. Results: In present study 71.66% patients are in age group of 21-30 years of age, this may be because this time period is the maximum fertile period and use of contraception is infrequent and occasional. 80% of patients were or more then two parity. Out of 60 patient in 70.75% case aetiology was made out with majority case with infection. In only one patient was heaving post operative infection, suggested by presence o adhesion. Conclusion: Due to advance diagnostic technique, conservative treatment is also possible and with recent surgical technique, the morbidity and mortality is drastically reduced.
References
2. Chudhary et al, The management of Ectopic Pregnancy, Irish Medical journal;2008 : 101(3);22-28.
3. Valmiki D R et al. Managment of ectopic Pregnency with massive hemoperitonium by leproscopic surgery with autolog blood transfusion. J Minimum Invasive Gynecol.; 13(1):43-48.
4. Martyan et al. Prospective study with improved diagnostic accuracy. Ann. Emergency medicine;1996;28;107.
5. Pratibha vaidya et al Thesis, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, LTMG hospoital Bombay, 1998, 45-56.
6. Bouyer J, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Grenier C, Aussel L, Job-Spira N. Ectopic pregnancy and occupational exposure of hospital personnel. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 1998;24:98-103.
