Study Of Femoral Neck Anteversion Of Adult Dry Femora In Gujarat Region

Study Of Femoral Neck Anteversion

Authors

  • Dr. Ankur Zalawadia
  • Dr. Srushti Ruparelia
  • Dr. Shaival Shah
  • Dr. Dhara Parekh
  • Dr. Shailesh Patel
  • Dr. S. P. Rathod
  • Dr. S. V. Patel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v1i3.1871

Keywords:

Femoral neck anteversion, Neck head axis, Transcondylar plane, Femur, Angle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the average angle of femoral neck anteversion in an Indian population. Unpaired 92
dry femurs, 50 of female (27 right and 23 left) and 42 of male (22 right and 20 left) devoid of any gross pathology were used to
measure the femoral neck angle (FNA) from Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College, Bhavnagar in year 2005. They were evaluated
by the Kingsley Olmsted method, and the data were statistically analyzed. In female femoral neck anteversion range form –8.3° to +30.4º
with a mean of 16.4º on left and 10.5º on right sides. In male femoral neck anteversion range from –13.7° to +25.6º with a mean of
14.3º on right and 7.2º on left sides. The female femora showed about 2.7° more anteversion than the male femora. The average left-sided
femora showed about 6.4° more anteversion than the right-sided femora.

References

1. Kim JS, Park TS, Park SB, Kim JS, Kim IY, Kim
SI.Measurement of femoral neck
anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging
method. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000;38:603-
9.
2. Napoli MM, Apostólico Netto A, Suguimoto
C, Takedo LT. Anteversão dos colos femorais:
estudo radiológico. Rev Imagem 1985;7:111-
6.
3. Crelin ES. Development of the
musculoskeletal system. Ciba clinical
Symposium. 1981;33(1):1-36.
4. Elftman H. Torsion of lower extremity.
American Journal of physical Anthropology
1945;3:255-265.
5. Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss C, King H. Lowerextremity
rotational problems in children:
normal values to guide management. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 1985;67:39-47.
6. Le Damany. Les torsions osseuses leur role
dans la transformation des members.
Journal of Anatomical Physiology 1903,39:
246-450.
7. Yagi T and Sasaki T. Tibial torsion in patients
with medial-type osteoarthritic knee. Clinical
Orthopaedics 1986;213:177-182.
8. Yoshioka Y, Siu D and Cooke TD. The
anatomy of functional axis of the femur.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
1987;69:873-880.
9. Kingsley PC and Olsmtead KL. A study to
determine the angle of anteversion of the
neck of femur. Journal of Bone and Joint
Surgery 1948;30-A:745-751.
10. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, et al.
Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1987;69:1169–76.
11. Eckhoff DG, Kramer RC, Watkings JJ, Alongi
CA, van Greven DP. Variation in femoral
Anteversion. Clinical Anatomy 1994;7:71-75.
12. Parsons FG. The characters of the English
thigh bone. J Anat Physiol 1914;48:238-67.
13. Kate BR The Ceylonese femur and its
comparison with Indian and other Asian
femur; Journal of Anatomical Society of India
1976;25(3); 124-127.

Downloads

Published

2010-09-30

How to Cite

Zalawadia, D. A., Ruparelia, D. S., Shah, D. S., Parekh, D. D., Patel, D. S., Rathod, D. S. P., & Patel, D. S. V. (2010). Study Of Femoral Neck Anteversion Of Adult Dry Femora In Gujarat Region: Study Of Femoral Neck Anteversion. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 1(3), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v1i3.1871

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>