Comparative Evaluation of Strontium Chloride Desensitizer and Novel Proarginin Desensitizer on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion-A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
Comparative Evaluation Of Strontium Chloride Desensitizer And Novel Proarginin Desensitizer On Dentinal Tubule Occlusion-A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v7i6.1399Keywords:
Dentinal Tubules, Dentifrices, Hypersensitivity, occlusionAbstract
Background: Dentinal hypersensitivity is the commonest dental problem. For this,the products that occlude the dentinal tubules are most widely accepted. Objective: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of a well-established desensitizing dentifrice containing 2% strontium chloride with a new product 8% arginine on the dentinal tubules, following repeated brushing strokes on a dentine disc model. Methods: For the study, freshly extracted premolars were sectioned at the level of CEJ. The prepared dentin discs were cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaner, polished and etched with 0.5 M EDTA for 2 minutes to expose dentin tubule orifices. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group 1: control, Group 2: 2% strontium chloride and Group 3:8% pro-argin. The treatment consisted of application with the test dentifrices to the dentin discs followed by preparation for scanning electron microscopic examination. Results: The numbers of dentinal tubules open, partially occluded and completely occluded were counted and statistical analysis was obtained using Post-Hoc ANOVA test. Group 3 i.e. 8% arginine and calcium carbonate group showed highest complete tubule, with a statistically significant difference from group 1 and group 2. Conclusion: Proargin technology appears more promising in providing immediate relief as well as could be more effective on further application than strontium chloride based formulation. [Mayur P NJIRM 2016; 7(6): 85-92]
References
2. Brannstrom M, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-27.
3. Berman LH. Dentinal sensation and hypersensitivity. A review of mechanisms and treatment alternatives. J Periodontol 1985;56;216-22.
4. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J 2002 52: 367-375
5. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Haywood VB, Collins MA, Drisko CL: Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dent 2008; 4(2): 82-89
6. Cummins D. Dentin hypersensitivity: From diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent. 2009;20(1):1-9
7. Sena FJ. Dentinal permeability in assessing therapeutic agents. Dent Clin North Am. 1990 Jul;34(3):475-90.
8. Kanapka JA. Over-the-counter dentifrices in the treatment of tooth hypersensitivity. Review of clinical studies. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:545-60.
9. Gillam DG. Clinical trial design for testing of product for dentine hypersensitivity–a review. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr1997;45:37-46.
10. Kumar VR, Shubhashini N, Seshan H, Kranti K. A clinical trial comparing a stannous fluoride based dentifrice and a strontium chloride based dentifrice in alleviating dentinal hypersensitivity. J Int oral health 2010;2(1):37-50
11. Minkoff S, Axelrod S. Efficacy of strontium chloride in dental hypersensitivity. J Periodontol. 1987;58(7):470-4.
12. Cummins D. Clinical evidence for the superior efficacy of a dentrifice containing 8.0% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity J Clin Dent 2011;22(Spec Iss):97-99
13. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity; the development and evaluationof a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Periodontol 1989;16:190.
14. Kerns DG, Scheidt MJ, Pashley DH, Horner JA, Strong SL, Van Dyke TE. Dentinal tubule occlusion and root hypersensitivity. J Periodontol 1991;62:421
15. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR.A review of current approaches to in office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:561-81.
16. Gillam DG. Clinical trial design for testing of product for dentine hypersensitivity–a review. J West Soc Periodontol Abstr1997;45:37-46
17. Pearce NX, Addy M, Newcombe RG. Dentine hypersensitivity: A clinical trial to compare 2 strontium densensitizing toothpastes with a conventional fluoride toothpaste. J Periodontol 1994;65:113- 9.
18. Kanapka JA. Over-the-counter dentifrices in the treatment of tooth hypersensitivity. Review of clinical studies. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:545-60
19. Oberg C, Pochapski MT, Farago PV, Granado CJ, Pilatti GL, Santos FA. Evaluation of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and dentinal tubule occlusion: an in vitro study.Gen Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;57(5):496-501
20. Wolf MS, Kaufman H, Kleinberg I. Dentinal hypersensitivity following scaling and root planning (SRP) and dental Prophylaxis. J Dent Res 2002;80 (Spec Iss):191
21. Schiff T, Delgado E, Zhang YP, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate for the instant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2009 Mar;22 Spec No A:8A-15A
22. Kleinberg I. SensiStat. A new saliva-based composition for simple and effective treatment of dentinal sensitivity pain. Dent today 21: 42-47:2002
23. Petrou I, Heu R, Stranick M, et al. A breakthrough therapy for dentin hypersensitivity: how dental products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate work to deliver effective relief of sensitive teeth. Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2009;20(1):23–31.
24. Kleinberg I. A new saliva-based anticaries composition. Dentistry Today. 1999;18(2):98–103.
25. Markowitz K. A new treatment alternative for sensitive teeth: A desensitizing oral rinse.J Dent. 2013 Mar;41 Suppl 1:S1-S11
26. Topbas IB, Türkmen C, Günday M. An investigation of the effect of a desensitizing dentifrice on dentinal tubules in vitro and in vivo. Quintessence Int 1998;29:197-9.
