Predictability of Xenograft with Resorbable Barrier Membrane in the Management of Deficient Anterior Maxilla for Implant Placement
Predictability of Xenograft with Resorbable Barrier Membrane for Implant Placement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i2.1212Keywords:
Xenograft, Bio-Oss resorbable barrier membrane, deficient anterior maxilla, augmentation, Implant placementAbstract
This paper discusses the predictable use of xenograft with resorbable barrier membrane to widen the deficient anterior maxilla. The esthetic zone of premaxilla requires optimum volume of bone and soft tissue to achieve long term esthetic end result with special emphasis on the emergence profile. Compressing short or narrow implants into deficient ridges is a poor technique that often fails to correctly replace ridge anatomy or afford stable restorations. Patients with deficient anterior maxilla with missing maxillary anterior tooth were found suitable for this study. In the anterior maxilla the thin labial cortices were decorticated followed by tenting of resorbable barrier membrane for placement of Bio-Oss xenograft bone particles. Ten patients were included in this study out of which in some cases simultaneous implant placement was done and in rest of the cases implants were placed after a period of six months. In comparison to other bone graft materials xenograft has very good osteo conductivity and helps in regeneration of natural bone by maintaining its density for longer period of time.[Jigna S NJIRM 2017; 8(2):91-98]
References
2. S.M. Balaji, Management of Deficient anterior maxillary Alveolous with Mandibular parasymphyseal Bone Graft for Implants,J Implant dentistry 2002 vol 11/number4 ;363-369
3. Patrick Pallaci,Ingvar Ericsson. : Ant Maxilla classification,,Siebert1983Esthetic Implant Dentistry Soft and Hard Tissue Management. 2006;5;90-94 quintessence publishing.
4. Samuel E.Lynch, Robert J.Genco, Robert E.Marx. Grafting materials in Repair and Restoration, Arun K. Garg. Tissue engineering Application in Maxillofacial surgery and Periodontics.1999:5:83-93 quintessence publishing.
5. Carl E.Misch. maxillary Anterior Single-tooth placement, Facio Palatal width. Dental Implant Prosthetics.2005 Mosby:22:374-376.
6. Maiorana C, Beretta M, Salina S, Santoro F. Reduction of autogenous bone graft resorption by means of bio-oss coverage: a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Feb;25(1):19-25.
7. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with
8. simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):152-62.
9. Cannullo L, Malagnino VA. Vertical ridge augmentation around implants by e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and bovine bone matrix: a 24- to 54-month study of 10 consecutive cases.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 858-866.
10. Pieri F, Corinaldesi G, Fini M, Aldini NN, Giardino R, Marchetti C. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 2093-2103.
11. Buser D, Chen S, Weber HP, Belser U. Early Implant Placement Following Single Tooth Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: Biologic Rationale and Surgical Procedures. Int. Journal of Perio. And Rest. Dent 2008; 28: 441-451.
12. Inchingolo F, Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Inchingolo A M, Scacco S. Trial with Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Bio-Oss used as grafting materials in the treatment of the severe maxillar bone atrophy: clinical and radiological evaluations. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2010; 14: 1075-1084.
13. Mohammad R, Yalda S, AliAsghar HK, Naser S. Clinical Evaluation of Lateral Ridge Augmentation by Interpositional Bone Graft Method, Using a Mixture of Bio-oss and Autogenous Bone (A Pilot Study). J Mash Dent Sch 2009; 32(4): 277-84.
14. Stephen W, Froum J S, Cho S , Elian N, Monteiro B S ,Tamow D P, Sinus Augmentation Utilizing Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) with Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Membranes Placed over the Lateral Window Histomorphometric and Clinical Analyses. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2005; 203;573-0773.
15. Piattelli M, Favero G A, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A, Bone Reactions to Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Histologic Long-Term Report of 20 Cases in Humans. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS1999;14:835–840.
16. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):23-33.
17. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbablemembranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):19-25. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
18. Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient selectinon and preparation. Tissue integrated prostheses Ossiointigration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985; 199-210.
19. Hislop WS, Finlay PM, Moos KP . A preliminary study into the uses of anorganic bone in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jun;31(3):149-53.
20. Mish CE , Dietsh F,. bone grafting material in implant dentistry. Implant dent 193; 2; 158-167.
21. Spector M. Anorganic bovine bone and ceramic analogs of bone mineral as implants to facilitate bone regeneration. Clin Plast Surge 1994;21;437-444.
22. Pinholt EM, Bang G, Haanaes HR: Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio- Oss. Scand J. Dent Res 1991; 99: 154-61.
23. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss®. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1997;8:117–124
24. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Schärer P. Resorbable Versus Nonresorbable membranes with combination with bio-oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1997;12;844-852.
25. Schmitt JM, Buck DC, Joh SP, Lynch SE, Hollinger JO. Comparision of porous bone miniral and biologically active glass in crical sized defect. J Periodontol.1997 Nov; 68(11):1043-53.
26. cawood j, howell r a. a classification of the edentulous jaw. Int joral maxillofac surg.1991;17;232-236.
27. Stephen W, Froum J S, Cho S , Elian N, Monteiro B S ,Tamow D P, Sinus Augmentation Utilizing Anorganic Bovine Bone [Bio-Oss] with Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Membranes Placed over the Lateral Window Histomorphometric and Clinical Analyses. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2005; 203;573-0773.
28. Piattelli M, Favero G A, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A, Bone Reactions to Anorganic Bovine Bone [Bio-Oss] Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Histologic Long-Term Report of 20 Cases in Humans.INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS1999;14:835–840.