Prevalence of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Isolates Staphylococcus Aureus from Various Clinical Specimen At Tertiary Care Centre
Prevalence Of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance In Isolates Staphylococcus Aureus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i2.1198Keywords:
D test, MRSA, Staphylococcus aureusAbstract
Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus cases a variety of infections to skin and soft tissue infections to life threatening endocarditis. Therapeutic failure to Clindamycin has been reported due to mechanisms which confer resistance consitutively, or by the presence of low level inducers which can lead to therapeutic failure. Method: The present study January 2016 to 2016 November total 866 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various specimens like pus, blood, fluids, wound swab and urine were tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing were done by Kirby Bauer’s disc diffusion method .Inducible Clindamycin resistance was tested by Clindamycin disc induction test (D test) as per CLSI recommendations .Results: In present study was from January 2016 to November 2016 total sample 34,126 from their total 866 Staphylococcus aureus obtained from concecutive cilnical specimens were included, consisting of 97(11.2%) MRSA and 769(88.79%) MSSA. These isolates were subjected to D 121(13.97%) out of 866 Staphylococcus aureus Resistance showed Clindamycin 258(36%) and Erythromycin 453(63.44%).Sensitivity of Clindamycin 584(81.5%) and Erythromycin 423(59.2%). Conclusion: The D test is a simple effective and an important method for the phenotyping detection of inducible clindamycin resistance and it should be used routinely as it will help in guiding the empirical therapy. [Bhoya J NJIRM 2017; 8(2):39-43]
References
2. Yilmaz G,Aydin K, Iskender S, Caylan R, Koksal I. Detection and prevalence of inducible resistance in Staphylococci. J Med Microbiol 2007; 56:342-5.
3. Delialioglu N, Aslan G, Ozturk C ,Baki V, Sen S, Emekdas G.Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci isolated from clinical samples. Jpn J Infect Dis 2005; 58:104-6.
4. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th ed.
5. Clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI).performance standards for antimicrobialdisk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A7, 11th ed.2005: 768-800.
6. Chelae S, Laohaprertthisarn V, Phengmak M, Kongmuang U, Kalnauwakul S.Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci by disc diffusion induction test. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92(7):947-51.
7. Gadepalli R, Dhawan B ,Mohanty S, Kapil A, Das BK, Chaudhary R.Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res 2006;123:571-3.
8. Mallick SK, Basak S, Bose S. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus-A therapeutic challenge. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2009; 3:1513-18
9. Anuprabha S., Sen MR, Nath G, Sharma BM, Gulati Ak, Mohapatra TM. Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary referral hospital in Eastern Utter Pradesh. Indian J.Med. Microbiol 2003;90
10. Angel MR, Balaji V, Prakash JAJ, Brahmadathan KN, Mathews MS.Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in gram positive organisms in a tertiary care centre. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:262-4.
11. Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:4740-4.
12. Gupta V, Datta P, Rani H, Chander J. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A study from North India. J Postgrad
