Comparative Evaluation Of Anti – Bacterial Efficacy Of Sodium Hypochlorite And Carbolic Acid Against Enterococcus Faecalis As Root Canal Irrigant
Comparative Evaluation Of Anti – Bacterial Efficacy Of Sodium Hypochlorite And Carbolic Acid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v7i1.1055Keywords:
Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), E.Faecalis, Root Canal IrrigantAbstract
Background: Elimination of microorganisms from infected root canal is a complicated & difficult task. Elimination or sufficient reduction of irritants, microorganisms and prevention of recontamination of the root canal after the treatment is the essential factor for successes of the treatment. Methods: Following materials required for this study i.e. 36 teeth prepared for root canal inoculation, Enterococcus faecalis strain, 5 % and 10 % carbolic acid solution, 5.25 % sodium hypochlorite solution, phosphate buffer saline and normal saline solution. An overnight subculture plate of E.faecalis was taken for inoculum preparation and uniform suspension made in normal saline (02 ml) by taking up isolated colonies and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard which gives 1.5 X 108 cfu / ml. Result and Conclusion: From this study, we can conclude that 5.25 % NaOCl is one of the superior and successful endodontic irrigant against 5 % and 10% carbolic acid.In our study, result shows that sodium hypochlorite solution is superior to carbolic acid solution. However, as this study is in vitro study, not simulate the oral environment; further few clinical studies are required in evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of these solutions for predictable and successful endodontic outcome. [Soni R NJIRM 2016; 7(1):101-103]
References
evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of Sodium
Hypochlorite, MTAD and Tetraclean against
Enterococcus Faecalis biofilm. Journal of
Endodontics 2007; 33; 7:852 – 855.
2. Shahrokh Shabahang, Manouchehr Pouresmail,
Mahmoud Torabinejad. In Vitro antimicrobial
efficacy of MTAD and Sodium Hypochlorite.
Journal of Endodontics 2003; 39; 7:450 – 452.
3. C.E.Radcliffe, L.Potouridou, R. Quereshi, N.
Habahbeh. Antimicrobial activity of varying
concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on the
Endodontic microorganisms. International
Endodontic journal, 37,438 – 446. 2004.
4. L.M.Sassone, R. Fidel, S.Fidel, M. Vieira. The
influence of organic load on the antimicrobial
activity of different concentration of NaOCl and
chlorhexidine in vitro. International endodontic
journal, 36,848 – 852, 2003.
5. Bogra P, Nikhil V, Singh SV. Study of Dimercapto
succinic acid, Sodium hypochlorite and their
combination used as irrigant in root canals - An
in vitro study. Endodontology, Vol . 15 – 2003.
6. D.Kandaswamy and N.Venkateshbabu. Root
canal irrigants. Journal of Con. Dent. 2010 OctDec;
13(4): 256–264.
7. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB.
Enterococcus Faecalis: its role in root canal
treatment failure and current concepts in
retreatment. J Endod. 2006 Feb; 32(2):93-8.
8. Luciano Giardino, MD, DDS, Emanule Ambu,
MD, DDS, Enrico Savoldi, MD, DDS. Comparative
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sodium
Hypochlorite, MTAD, and Tetraclean against
Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm. JOE—Volume 20-
2007.
9. Charles H. Stuart, DDS, Christopher B. Owatz.
Enterococcus faecalis: It’s Role in Root Canal
Treatment failure and current concepts in
retreatment. JOE — Volume 32, Number 2,
February 2006.
