Institutional Survey Of Student’s Opinion For Tutorial Classes
Students Feedback On Tutorial Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v7i1.1050Keywords:
Tutorial, validated questionnaire form, feedbackAbstract
Background & Objective: To know the student’s opinion about the current tutorial classes held in department of pharmacology of HIMS Methodology: The study was conducted on 250, second professional students of HIMS attending pharmacology department. A validated questionnaire of 15 questions was prepared. Each question had 3-5 options and lastly about their suggestions and comments. Students were briefed about the study before giving them the feedback form. They were given sufficient time to fill the form and were asked not to reveal their identity for unbiased opinion. Results: 97% of students agreed that tutorial helps them in understanding the topic better. Majority of students (68%) will attend tutorial classes even if attendance is not compulsory. When asked about the environment during the tutorial, 72% of the respondents said that it is strict but interactive. Majority of students were in favour that tutorial’s topic should run parallel with lecture topic and should be taken by postgraduate students only. When asked about the structure of tutorial, majority of students (52%) felt that discussing whole topic will help them most. Many students suggested that tutorials should be well planned, organized and cover difficult topics in pharmacology i.e General, ANS and CNS. Conclusion: Teaching is a novel teaching technique which enhances interest among students. With some modifications and suggestions we can enhance the effectiveness of our current tutorials. [Dwivedi S NJIRM 2015; 7(1):79-82]
References
2. Getting the most out of tutorials In: The faculty of economics and commerce 2nd edition, Teaching and Learning unit, Faculty of economics and commerce, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from tlu.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/tutorials2ed.pdf.
3. Mathur VS. Towards a more meaningful teaching of pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol. 2004; 36(4):259-261.
4. Sivagnanam G, Sarawathi S, Rajasekaran A. Student-led objective tutorial (SLOT) in medical education. Med Educ Online [serial online] 2006;11:7
5. Medical Council of India- Salient features of Regulation on graduate medical education (1997) in Part-III, Section 4 of the Gazette of India dated 17th May 1997. Retrieved from http:/mciinndia.org/ know rules/rules-mbbs.htm.
6. Letassy NA, Fugate SE, Medina MS, Stroup JS, Britton MI. Using team based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses. American, Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2008; 72(5):1-6.
7. World health organisation, national drug policy and rational drug use. A model curriculum (Draft) DAP/85, 6. Action programme on essential drugs. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1985
8. Ahmed M.W DP, Gulabani M, Ahmed R, Javedar P, Mishra R. Undergraduate mbbs and bds students’ opinion based survey on current teaching practices in pharmacology and changes recommended for betterment of the same. J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci. 2014;Vol. 3(Issue 70).
9. World health organisation, national drug policy and rational drug use. A model curriculum (Draft)DAP/85, 6. Action programme on essential drugs. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1985.
10. Ravens U, Nitsche I, Haag C, Dobrev D. What is a good tutorial from the student’s point of view? Evaluation of tutorials in a newly established PBL block course “Basics of Drug Therapyâ€. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2002;366:69-76.
11. Effectiveness of team based learning to teach pharmacology for phase-II MBBS students. Al Ameen J Med Sc i. 2014; ;(3) (7):181-7.
12. Goyal M BM, Gupta A, Yadav S. Perceptions and suggestions of 2nd professional MBBS students about their teaching and learning process: An analytical study. NJIRM. 2010;Vol. 1(4).
