A Comparative Study of Laboratory Diagnosis ofGenital Chlamydial Infections InWomen By Immunofluorescence And By Conventional Staining Method.

A Comparative Study Of Laboratory Diagnosis Of Genital Chlamydial Infections

Authors

  • Dr. H K Bhavsar
  • Dr. Nidhi K Sood
  • Dr.Manisha M Jain
  • Dr.Dhara J Modi
  • Hetal Shah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i4.755

Keywords:

Chlamydia trachomatis, Genital Chlamydia infections

Abstract

Objective: The major objective of this study was to carry out concurrent testing of cervical swab samples with both conventional and fluorescent staining method using Giemsa stain & direct fluorescent antibody stain (DFA) respectively. The study would enable us to establish an appropriate, effective and sensitive method of diagnosis of genital chlamydial infections within the present set-up.Material & methods: The study “A Comparative Study of laboratory Diagnosis of Genital Chlamydial Infections in Women by Immunofluorescence and Conventional Staining Method†was conducted on 50 patients attending the OPD of a tertiary care hospital of Ahmedabad. Results: Out of the total 50 cases tested, four samples were found positive containing dark-purple inclusion bodies of Chlamydia trachomatis surrounding the nuclei of the host cells in Giemsa and the same were positive for elementary bodies of C. trachomatis by the DFA staining. Based on these samples, the prevalence of is 8% only.Conclusion: The present comparative study of Giemsa and DFA staining for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in females showed that both methods are equally sensitive for the detection of the microorganism.[Jain M NJIRM 2014; 5(4) :1-3]

References

1. KonemanE.W, Allen S.D, JandaW.M, SchreckenbergerP.C, Winn W.C. Colour Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th Edition, Page No. 1260-1264.
2. AnanthanarayanR, PanikerC.K. J. Textbook of Microbiology. 6th Edition, Page No. 389-394; 2002.
3. Watson E.J, Templeton A, Russell I, PaavonenJ, MardhP A, StaryA, Pederson B.S. The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systemic review, J. Med. Microbiol. 51: Page No. 1021-1031; 2002.
4. Black C.M. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 10: Page No 160-184; 1997.
5. Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention.1985.Chlamydia trachomatis infections Policy Guidelines for Prevention and Control. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 34: 53-74.
6. Chan S.W, Cunningham A.L. Comparison of Giemsa and fluorescent monoclonal antibody staining of inoculated cell cultures for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Pathhology. 26(2): Page No. 194-197; 1994.
7. Collee J.G., Fraser A.G., Marnion B.P, Simmons A. Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th Edition. Page No. 621-630;1996.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-31

How to Cite

Bhavsar, D. H. K., Sood, D. N. K., Jain, D. M., Modi, D. J., & Shah, H. (2014). A Comparative Study of Laboratory Diagnosis ofGenital Chlamydial Infections InWomen By Immunofluorescence And By Conventional Staining Method.: A Comparative Study Of Laboratory Diagnosis Of Genital Chlamydial Infections. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 5(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i4.755

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)