Study Of Primary Caesarean Section In Multiparous Women
Study Of Primary Caesarean Section In Multiparous Women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i2.695Keywords:
primary caesarean section, caesarean section in multiparaAbstract
Background: This prospective study was carried out to assess, indication, maternal & fetal outcome of primary caesarian in multiparous women. Materials & Methods: 50 women with primary CS (caesarean section) studied in multiparous women studied and analysed. Results: Most of women belonged to >25yrs age group, rural, & low socio-economic group, Malpresentation, Low AFI (amniotic fuid index), Fetal Distress were most common indications. Post operative uneventful in majority of cases. Conclusion: Antenatal care in multigravida, USG (ultra-sonography) Analysis Close monitoring can reduce CS(caesarean section) in multipara. [ Saluja J K NJIRM 2014; 5(2) :27-29]
References
1. ACOG practice bulletin no.54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Obstet gynecol 2004; 104:203-12.
2. Asha Oumachigui. Rising rates of caesarean section: the way ahead. Indian J Med Res 124, August 2006, 119-122
3. Kasturi Lal. Primary caesarean section in grand multipara. J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 22:651-54
4. Menacker F. Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990-2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. Sep 22 2005; 54(4):1-8.
5. Samir Prasad sen. Primary cesarean section in multipara. J Obstet Gynecol India 1967; 17:523-29.
6. Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C & Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section inevitable? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996; 105: 45±52.
7. Kalavashishta, Rekha L, Gupta N. Primary cesarean section in grandmultipara.J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 26:651-57.
8. Eastman N. Multiparity and its effect on maternal and perinatal mortality. Obstet and Gynecol Survey 1958; 13:833-37
9. Solomon B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet 1932; 2: 8-11.
10. Bugg GJ, Atwal GS, Maresh M. Grandmultiparae in a modern setting. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;109:249-53.
11. Edith DG, Paul D. The labor curve of the grand multipara: does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1331-8.
12. Feeny K. The unpredictable multipara. J Irish Med Assoc. 1953; 32: 36-40.
13. Neeraj B. The grand multipara. Renu Mishra, editor. Ian Donald’s practical Obstetric problems 6th edn. BI publications pvt Ltd, 2007; 89-102
14. Sarah I, Jacob, Hitesh. Primary cesarean section in multiparous women. J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 22:642-50.
15. Dill L, Leonard J, Sheffery B. Caesarean section for disproportion in multipara.Am J Obstet and Gynecol 1968; 10:100117.
16. Ford J, Grewal J, Mikolajczyk F, Meikle S, Zhang J. Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990–2003. Obstet and Gynecol.2008; 112(6):1235-41
2. Asha Oumachigui. Rising rates of caesarean section: the way ahead. Indian J Med Res 124, August 2006, 119-122
3. Kasturi Lal. Primary caesarean section in grand multipara. J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 22:651-54
4. Menacker F. Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990-2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. Sep 22 2005; 54(4):1-8.
5. Samir Prasad sen. Primary cesarean section in multipara. J Obstet Gynecol India 1967; 17:523-29.
6. Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C & Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section inevitable? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996; 105: 45±52.
7. Kalavashishta, Rekha L, Gupta N. Primary cesarean section in grandmultipara.J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 26:651-57.
8. Eastman N. Multiparity and its effect on maternal and perinatal mortality. Obstet and Gynecol Survey 1958; 13:833-37
9. Solomon B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet 1932; 2: 8-11.
10. Bugg GJ, Atwal GS, Maresh M. Grandmultiparae in a modern setting. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;109:249-53.
11. Edith DG, Paul D. The labor curve of the grand multipara: does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1331-8.
12. Feeny K. The unpredictable multipara. J Irish Med Assoc. 1953; 32: 36-40.
13. Neeraj B. The grand multipara. Renu Mishra, editor. Ian Donald’s practical Obstetric problems 6th edn. BI publications pvt Ltd, 2007; 89-102
14. Sarah I, Jacob, Hitesh. Primary cesarean section in multiparous women. J Obstet Gynecol India 1972; 22:642-50.
15. Dill L, Leonard J, Sheffery B. Caesarean section for disproportion in multipara.Am J Obstet and Gynecol 1968; 10:100117.
16. Ford J, Grewal J, Mikolajczyk F, Meikle S, Zhang J. Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990–2003. Obstet and Gynecol.2008; 112(6):1235-41
Downloads
Published
2018-01-01
How to Cite
Saluja, D. J., Roy, D. P. K., & Mahadik, D. K. (2018). Study Of Primary Caesarean Section In Multiparous Women: Study Of Primary Caesarean Section In Multiparous Women. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 5(2), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i2.695
Issue
Section
Original Articles
