Study of Bacteriological Profile of Post Operative Wound Infections In Obstetrics And Gynaecological Surgeries In A Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Sandeep Bhaskarrao Kokate Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology,Government Medical College & Hospital,Nagpur- 440003, Maharashtra, India
  • Vaishali Rahangdale Professor & Head, Department of Microbiology,Government Medical College & Hospital,Nagpur- 440003, Maharashtra, India
  • V J Katkar Professor & Head, Department of Microbiology,Government Medical College & Hospital,Nagpur- 440003, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v9i2.2309

Keywords:

Surgical site infection, antibiotic resistance, MRSA

Abstract

Background & objectives: Surgical site infections (SSI) are third most commonly reported nosocomial infections. For any given type of operation, development of a wound infection approximately doubles the cost of  hospitalization. So the present study conducted to isolate different organisms   from post-operative wound infections from Obstetrics and Gynaecology surgeries, to determine antibiotic sensitivity pattern of these isolates and to determine the rate of SSI. Methods: All the pus samples of clinically suspected SSI cases  were immediately   processed by standard bacteriological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed. Results: The incidence of SSI in our set up was 1.64 %.The most common organism isolated from SSI cases was staphylococcus aureus (41.42%). 31.03% MRSA were isolated from SSI cases. All the MRSA were sensitive to vancomycin and Linezolid. Gram negative bacilli showed maximum sensitivity towards piperacillin-tazobactam, imepenem & polymyxin B.The production of ESβL among Gram negative bacilli varies from 25% to 33% and Ampc β lactamase production varies from 12% to 25%. Interpretation & conclusion: Guidelines and protocols for basic infection control practices   such as hand washing, written protocols of  perioperative,  intraoperative and post operative infection control practices  should be widely available and adhered to.

References

1. Olson, M., O’Conner, M., Schwartz, M.L., Ann Surg 1984, 199, 253- 259.
2. Lilani, S.P., Jangale, N., Chowdhary, A., Daver, G.B., Ind J Med Microbiol 2005, 23, 249-252.
3. Anvikar, A.R,, Deshmukh, A.B., Karyakarte, R.P., Damle, A.S. Patwardhan, N.S., Malik, A.K. et al., Ind J Med Microbiol 1999, 17, 129-132.
4. Dellinger, E.P., in: Sabiston, D.C., Lyerly, K. (Eds.), Text Book of Surgery, 15th Edn., WB Saunders Company, Philadeiphia 1997, pp.264-280.
5. Nandi, P.L., Rajan, S.S., Mak, K.C., Chan, S.C., So, Y.P., Hong Kong Medical Journal 1999, 5, 82-86.
6. Razavi, S.M., Ibrahimpoor, M., Kashani, A.S., Jafarani, A., BMC Surgery 2005, 5, 1-5.
7. Nichols RL. Current Strategies for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Curr Infect Dis Rep.2004 Dec; 6(6):426-434.
8. Center for Disease Control, National Nosocomial Infections Study Quarterly Report, First and Second Quarters 1973; Altlanta, CDC, July, 1974.
9. Collee JG, Marr W. Specimen collection, culture containers and media In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A (eds) : Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, 14th ed, NewYork : Churchill –Livingstone, pp 95-112.1996a
10. Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B.Tests for identification of bacteria In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A (eds) : Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, 14thed, NewYork : Churchill –Livingstone, pp 131 - 50.1996b
11. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 45: 493-6,1966
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; Approved standard, 2013, vol. 33, No.1, M100-S23.
13. Anvikar AR, Deshmukh AB, Karyakarte ,RP, Damle AS, Patwardhan NS, Malik, AK.et al. A one year prospective study of 3280 surgical wounds. Indian J Medical Microbiol.1999; 17(3):129-32.
14. Lilani SP, Jangale N, Chowdhary A, Daver GB. Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases. Indian J Medical Microbiol. 2005; 23(4):249-52.
15. Khan MA, Ansari MN, Bano S. Post operative wound infection. Ind. J. Surg. 1985; 48:383-86.
16. Rao AS, Harsha M. Postoperative wound infections. J. Indian M.A.1975; 64(4):90-3.
17. Tripathy BS, Roy N. Post-operative wound sepsis. Ind. J. Surg.1984; 47:285-8.
18. Kamath N, Swaminathan R, Sonawane J, Bharos N. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infections in a tertiary care center in Navi Mumbai [abstract]. Proceedings of the 16th Maharashtra Chapter Conference of IAMM; 2010 Sept 24-26; Karad, Maharashtra. p. 61.
19. Prabhakar H, Arora S, A bacteriological study of wound infections. J Indian Med Assoc.1979; 73(9&10):145-8.
20. Ramesh Rao, S.Sumathi2, K.Anuradha, D.Venkatesh, S.Krishna. Bacteriology of postoperative wound infections. Int J Pharm Biomed Res 2013, 4(2), 72-76
21. Mohammad Shahid Raza1, Anil Chander, Abirodh Ranabhat.Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of the Bacterial Isolates in Post-Operative Wound Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital,Kathmandu,Nepal. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2013, 3, 159-163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojmm.2013.33024 Published Online September 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojmm)
22. Gayathree Naik, Shrinivas Deshpande. A Study on Surgical Site Infections Caused by Staphylococcus Aureus with a Special Search for Methicillin-Resistant Isolates. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011 June, Vol-5(3): 502-508

Downloads

Published

2018-05-16

How to Cite

Kokate, S. B., Rahangdale, V., & Katkar, V. J. (2018). Study of Bacteriological Profile of Post Operative Wound Infections In Obstetrics And Gynaecological Surgeries In A Tertiary Care Hospital. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 9(2), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v9i2.2309

Issue

Section

Original Articles