Effect of 3 Different Medicaments on Dimensional Stability and Surface Detail Reproduction Of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material
Effect of 3 Different Medicaments on$ Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v3i4.2086Keywords:
Dimentional Stability, Surgace Detail, Polyvinyl siloxane Impression MaterialAbstract
Aim:Surface detail reproduction and dimensional stability of Poly vinyl siloxane impression material is most important property for final success of fixed partial denture. Purpose: This study was carried out to determine the effect of retraction cord medicaments (epinephrine, aluminum chloride and ferric sulfate) on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Method and materials: Polyvinyl siloxane impressions were made of standardized metal dies (American Dental Association [ADA] specification No. 19) and was treated with 1 of the 3 retraction cord medicaments. Dimensional accuracy was evaluated by comparing the average length of a line in the impressions to the standard die. Surface detail reproduction was evaluated by viewing the impressions under low-angle illumination at 10X magnification. Reproduction was considered satisfactory if 2 of 3 horizontal lines were reproduced continuously. The dies were also evaluated under the microscope before the impression was made. Results: The medicaments did not significantly affect the dimensional stability. Aluminum chloride and ferric sulfate had an adverse effect on surface detail reproduction. Epinephrine had no effect. Discussion: The changes in dimensional accuracy were within ADA guidelines, the surface detail reproduction was modified such that the impression would be considered clinically unacceptable. For optimal results, care must be taken to remove all traces of these retraction cord medicaments prior to recording of a polyvinyl siloxane impression.
References
2. Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns - Literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 396-400.
3. Eissmann HF,Radke RA,Noble WH: Physiologic design criteria for fixed dental restorations.Dent Clin North Am 1971;15:543-568.
4. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics.4thed.St.Louis:Mosby Inc; 2007. Chapter 7, Principal of tooth preparation; p.217-19.
5. Harrison JD. Effect of retraction materials on the gingival sulcus epithelium .J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 514-21.
6. Azzi R, Tsao TF, Carranza FA Jr, Kenney EB. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 561-5.
7. Donovan TE, Gandara BK, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 525-31.
8. Weir DJ, Williams BH. Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 326-9.
9. Nemetz H. Tissue management in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 31:628-36.
10. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Specification 19 for non-aqueous elastomeric dental impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 94: 733-41; addendum 1982; 105: 686.
11. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of Dental materials. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1966: Nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials (Ed). 139-176.
12. Maris C, Gabriella N, Janos V and Arpad F. Dose related effect of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 6-11.
13. Olalekan AAY, Cornel HD, Andre JB. SEM-EDX study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids. Journal of Dentistry 2005; 33: 731-9.
14. Beier US, Kranewitter R, Dumfahrt H. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system – a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. Int J Prostodont 2009; 22: 143-7.
15. Katsuhiko K, Kinya T, Minoru T and Kent TO. Indirect latex glove contamination and its inhibition effect on vinyl polysiloxane polymerization. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 433-8.
16. Bernd W, Peter R, Dieter T and Markus B. Effect of different retraction and impression technique on the marginal fit of crowns. Journal of Dentistry 2008; 36: 508-512.
17. Shillinberg HT Jr., Sumiya Hobo, Whitsett LD, Richard Jacobi, Brackette SE. Fundamentals offixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing co. Inc; 1997.
18. Tylman, Malone WF, Koth DL, Edmund Cavazos Jr., Kaiser DA, Margano SM. Theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th ed. USA: Medicodental media international Inc; 2001.
19. Craig RG. Impression materials. In: Craig RG (Ed). Restorative Dental materials. St Louis : Mosby, 1989 : 293-346
