A Study of Superficial Mycoses in Tertiary Care Hospital
A Study of Superficial Mycoses in Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v3i1.1974Keywords:
Dermatophytes, Superficial mycosis, Tinea corporis, Trichophyton rubrumAbstract
Background & Objectives: Fungal infections are extremely common in the tropical regions and some of them are serious .Fungi produce diverse human infections ranging from superficial skin infections to systemic disease .The study of superficial mycosis is important due to the frequent occurrence in dermatology clinics. The present study was undertaken with a view to find out the clinical pattern of dermatophytic and non – dermatophytic fungi (superficial mycosis) and most common fungal pathogens in tertiary care hospital affiliated with medical college in Western India from August 2007 to July 2008. Methods: A clinical and mycological study of superficial mycosis was conducted on 215 cases (138 males and 77 females). Direct microscopy by KOH (potassium hydroxide) mount and culture was undertaken to isolate the fungal pathogen in each case. Results: Commonest age group involved was adults of 19-59 years age. Tinea corporis was the most common clinical presentation and Trichopyton rubrum was the most common fungal pathogen isolated. Dermatophytosis was the commonest superficial fungal infection and found in 147/215 cases (68.4%). Non dermatophytic fungus like pityriasis versicolor and yeast like candida species were isolated in 48/215(22.3%) cases and 20/215 (9.3%) cases respectively. The KOH positivity rate was 72.4% and total culture positivity rate was 62.8%.Interpretation & conclusion: Along with dermatophytes, nondermatophytic fungi are also emerging as important causes of superficial mycosis. Direct microscopy and culture both are important tools for diagnosis of the fungal infections.
References
2. Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. Fungi. In: Mackie McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, 14th ed. Churchill Livingstone, UK; 1996: 695-717.
3. Tony Burns, Neil Cox et al, Rook’s textbook of Dermatology, Vol. 2, 7th edition.
4. Aggarwal A, Arora U, Khanna S. Clinical and Mycological Study of Superficial Mycoses in Amritsar. Indian J dermatol 2002; 47:4: 218 – 20.
5. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC. Mycology. In: Color Atlas and Text book of Diagnostic Microbiology, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, USA; 1997: 983 – 1069.
6. A.A. Padhye and I. Weitzman, The dermatophytes, Topley and Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial infections, 10th edition, London,2005:782-815.
7. Grover and Roy, Clinico-mycological profile of superficial mycosis in a hospital in North-East India, MJAFI, Vol. 59, page no. 2, 2003.
8. Singh S, Beena PM; Profile of dermatophyte infections in Baroda, IJDVL, Vol. 69, Page 281 – 283, 2003.
9. Oliveira JAA, Barros JA, Cortez ACA, Oliveira JSRL, Superficial mycoses in the city of Manaus/AM; An Bras Dermatol. 2006, 238-243.
10. D. R. B. H. Vasu, Incidence of dermatophytosis in Warangal, A.P. India. Indian Journal of Medical Research, May 1966, 54; 468 – 74.
11. Philpot C. M. Some aspects of the epidemiology of tinea. Mycopathologia 1997,3,62.
12. Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P; Onychomycosis – Epidemiology, diagnosis and management, IJMM, 2008, 26(2): 108 – 16.
13. R.N. Gupta and S.K.Shome;Dermatomycoses in Uttar Pradesh - an analysis of 620 cases. Indian Journal of Medical Associates 1959; 22(2); 39 – 43.
14. S.L. Kalra, L.N. Mahapatra & H.C. Gugnani. Etiology of dermatomycosis in Delhi. Indian Journal of Medical Research June 1964; 52; 553 – 58.
15. Rosen T. Cutaneous Candidiasis. In: Bodey GP, Fainstein V. New York: Raven Press, 1985; 227 – 40.
16. Mohanty JC, Mohanty SK, Sahoo RC et al. Diagnosis of superficial mycoses by direct microscopy – a statistical evaluation. IJDV, 1999; 65: 72 – 4.
