Study of variation in atypical foramina of dry human skull
Study of variation in atypical foramina of dry human skull
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v2i2.1898Keywords:
parietal foramen, lacrimal foramen, emissary sphenoidal, anatomical variation, skullAbstract
Foramina or openings in the skull are very important as they allow passage of important structures likes nerves and blood vessels through them. Various people have studied variations in foramina as these variants have been found to be related to many disease states, which can be either acquired or inherited. Out of various skull foramina, we studied three atypical foramina named lacrimal, emissary sphenoidal & parietal in 103 dried human skulls. We looked for their presence unilaterally/bilaterally, their numbers, dimension and comparison bilaterally. Lacrimal foramen was absent bilaterally in 41% of the skulls while present unilaterally in 29% with an average size of 0.86 mm. Emissary sphenoidal foramen was absent bilaterally in 49%of the skulls, present unilaterally in 20% with an average size of 0.87 mm. When compared bilaterally 11% of the skulls showed difference of more than 0.5mm in emissary sphenoidal foramen while it was multiple in 2% of the skulls studied. Parietal foramen was absent bilaterally in 20% of the skulls while it was present unilaterally in 29% with an average size of 0.91 mm. When compared bilaterally 15% of the skulls had difference of more than 0.5mm.The foramen studied showed variation in different parameters observed which might be due to genetic, nutritional, environmental differences or some disease conditions. Knowledge of presence and variation in its anatomical parameter can be crucial for surgeons and anesthetists.
References
2. Wood J. F. The non-metrical morphological characteristic of the skull as criteria for racial diagnosis. Part 1. General discussion of the morphological characters employed in racial diagnosis. J. Anat. 1931; 65:179 - 195.
3. Richardson ML, Helms CA, Vogler JB 3d, Genant HK. Skeletal changes in neuromuscular disorders mimicking juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and hemophilia. AJR 1984;143:893 - 897.
4. Little BB, Knoll KA, Klein VR, Heller KB. Hereditary cranium bifidum and symmetric parietal foramina are the same entity. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Apr;35(4) 453 - 8.
5. Reddy AT, Hedlund GL, Percy AK.Enlarged parietal foramina - association with cerebral venous and cortical anomalies. Neurology 2000 Mar 14;54(5)1175 - 8
6. Shaffer LG, Hecht JT, Ledbetter DH, Greenberg F. Familial interstitial deletion 11(p11.12p12) associated with parietal foramina, brachymicrocephaly, and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet. 1993;45:581 - 3. 7. Golabi M, Carey J, Hall BD. Parietal foramina clavicular hypoplasia. An autosomal dominant syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1984;138(6) 596 - 9.
8. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Martin MM et al. Gray’s Anatomy.38th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London 1995, pp 425-736.
9. Krishnamurthy A, Nayak SR, Prabhu LV, Mansur DI, Ramanathan L, Madhyastha S, Saralaya V. The morphology of meningo-orbital foramen in south Indian population. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109(11):517-9.
10. Georgiou C, Cassell MD. The foramen meningo-orbitale & its relationship to the development of ophthalmic artery. J.Anat.1992(119 - 25)
11. Lanzieri CF, Duchesneau PM, Rosenbloom SA, Smith AS, Rosenbaum AE. The significance of asymmetry of the foramen of Vesalius. Section of Neuroradiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44106. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9(6) 1201-4
12.Bergman R.A., Thompson S.A., Afifi A.K., Saadeh F.A., (1988). Compendium of Human Anatomic Variation; World Literature, Catalog and Atlas. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich and Baltimore.
13. Ginsberg LE, Pruett SW, Chen MY, Elster AD. Skull - base foramina of the middle cranial fossa - reassessment of normal variation with high - resolution CT. JNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15(2) - 283 – 91
14. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography - Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(5):489.
15. Kwiatkowski J, Wysocki J, Nitek S. The morphology and morphometry of the so-called "meningo-orbital foramen" in humans. Folia Morphol(Warsz).2003;62(4):323-5.
16. Kodama K, Inoue K, Nagashima M. Studies On the Foramen Vesalius in the Japanese juvenile & adult skulls. Hokkaido Igako zasshi.1997;72(6) 667 – 74
17. Boyd G.I. Emissary foramen of the cranium in arthropods. J. anat. 1930; (65)108 - 121.
18. Gupta N, Ray B, Ghosh S. Anatomic characteristics of foramen Vesalius.Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2005; 3(2) 155-158
19. Fein JM, Brinker RA. Evolution and significance of giant parietal foramina. Report of five cases in one family. J Neurosurg. 1972;37: 487 - 92
20. Garcia-Minaur S, Mavrogiannis LA, Rannan-Eliya SV, Hendry MA, Liston WA, Porteous ME, Wilkie AO. 2003. Parietal foramina with cleidocranial dysplasia is caused by mutation in MSX2. Eur J Hum Genet 11(11):892-5.
