Study of Drug Use Pattern & Analysis of Quality of Life In Patients of Acne Attending The Dermatology OPD In A Tertiary Care Hospital
Study of Drug Use Pattern & Analysis of Quality of Life In Patients of Acne Attending The Dermatology OPD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v9i1.1864Keywords:
Acne, Quality of Life, CADI, DLQI, Drug Utilization PatternAbstract
Background: Acne vulgaris is a skin condition affecting a large proportion of the population. Various drug therapies are available for the same, which include topical and systemic drugs. Additionally, this disease has a profound impact on the quality of life (QOL) and hence this study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the drug use pattern as well the quality of life in such individuals. Aims: To study the drug utilization pattern of Acne vulgaris in Out Patient Department of Dermatology in a tertiary care hospital. To analyze health related Quality of Life using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) Methods: (including settings and design and statistical analysis used) This was a prospective, cross sectional study of 8 weeks duration, which was approved by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). It was carried out on the patients visiting the Dermatology OPD at a tertiary care hospital who were diagnosed with acne for at least one month. The responses of patients were recorded by using the CADI and the DLQI questionnaires that addressed various aspects of QOL. The drug utilization pattern was also studied. The data was analyzed using the SPSS 22 software. The Spearman rho test was applied. Results: Mean age of the patients was 20.23 ± 2.78 years with male: female ratio 0.69:1. Majority of the patients were diagnosed with grade 2 acne vulgaris. A total of 389 drugs were prescribed to 90 patients. The number of drugs received by each patient was 4.32. The most commonly prescribed topical drug in this sample was clindamycin phosphate, which formed 26.83% of the total topical drugs. Among the systemically prescribed drugs, azithromycin was the most commonly used. The Cardiff Acne Disability Index and the Dermatology Life Quality Index was used to determine the Quality of Life of patients suffering from acne vulgaris. The mean CADI score was 6.34 ± 3.625. It was noted that the highest score was 21 and was scored by patients of the age group 21 to 23 years. The mean DLQI score was 9.02 ± 5.821, indicating that acne vulgaris moderately affects the health related quality of life of the patients. From the survey, it was observed that the highest score was 26 obtained from patients of the age group 18 to 20 years. Limitations: The study has limited sample size of 90 patients. Hence, entire spectrum of the disease and QOL correlation will not be robust. The correlation of improvement of QOL scores with therapy of acne could not evaluated. As it was a prospective, single point study, of limited duration, the improvement in the quality of life of the patients suffering from different grades of acne vulgaris, could not be assessed. Conclusions: The drug use pattern indicated that topical drugs formed a greater part of the treatment plans as compared to systemic drugs. Our study has also described the impact of acne on Quality of Life. Hence, dermatologists should be encouraged to add Quality of Life evaluations for patients with acne, since these might reveal a new facet of the disease, that is, its psychosocial impact and help intervene with more individual specific interventions
References
2. WHO Introduction to Drug Utilization Research, Geneva 2003
3. Finlay Andrew Y. Review article: Quality of Life indices Indian Journal of DermatologyVenereology and Leprology, Year 2004, Volume 70, Issue 3
4. Cunliffe WJ. Acne and unemployment.The British Journal of Dermatology. 1986;115(3):386. [PubMed]
5. S. P. Narwane, T. C. Patel, Y. C. Shetty and S. B. Chikhalkar: Drug Utilization and Cost Analysis for Common Skin Diseases in Dermatology OPD of an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital - A Prescription Survey, British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2011;1(1): 9-18
6. Kumar S, Dutta S, Beg MA, Mehta AK, Anjoom M, Sindhu S. Drug utilization pattern in acne vulgaris in skin outpatients department of a tertiary care teaching hospital at Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Int J Med Sci Public Health, 2014;3:855-858.
7. Patro N, Jena M, Panda M, Dash M.A Study on the Prescribing Pattern of Drugs for Acne in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Odisha. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2015:9(3): 4-6.
8. Felix Boon-Bin Yap.The impact of acne vulgaris on the quality of life in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery, 2012:16: 57-60.
9. Ghaderi R, Saadatjoo A, and Ghaderi F. Evaluating of Life Quality in Patients with Acne Vulgaris Using Generic and Specific Questionnaires. Dermatology Research and Practice, vol. 2013, Article ID 108624, 6 pages
10. Motley RJ, Finlay AY.Practical use of a disability index in the routine management of acne. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 1992; 17: 1-3
11. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol, 1994; 19: 210-216
12. Lewis V L, Finlay A Y. Ten years experience of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2004; 9(2):169-180.
13. Hongbo Y, Thomas C L, Harrison M A, Salek M S, Finlay A Y. Translating the Science of Quality of Life into Practice: What Do Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores Mean? J Invest Dermatol, 2005, 125:659-664.
14. Basra MKA, Fenech R, Gatt RM, Salek MS, Finlay AY. The Dermatology Life Quality Index 1994-2007: a comprehensive review of validation data and clinical results. Br J Dermatol.2008; 159:997-1035.
15. AY Finlay. Current severe psoriasis and the Rule of Tens. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 861-867.
16. Khilji FA, Gonzalez M, Finlay AY. Clinical meaning of change in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147 (suppl 2): 50.
17. Kowalski J, Ravelo A, Weng E, Slaton T. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in patients with axillary and palmar hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: AB52 (P546).
18. Melilli L, Shikiar R, Thompson C. Minimal clinically important difference in Dermatology Life Quality Index in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis patients treated with adalimumab. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54: AB221 (P2894).
19. Shikiar R, Harding G, Leahy Michael, Lennow RD. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): Results from patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 36.
20. Shikiar R, Willian MK, Okun MM et al. The validity and responsiveness of three quality of life measures in the assessment of psoriasis patients: results of phase II study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 71
21. Piskin S, Uzunali E. A review of the use of adapalene for the treatment of acne vulgaris.Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2007;3(4):621-624.
22. Durai P, Nair D. Acne vulgaris and quality of life among young adults in South India. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 2015:16(1): 33-40.
23. Krishnaswamy K., Dinesh, Kumar B., Radhaiah G. A drug use survey- precepts and practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985; 29: 363–370.
24. Alvarez-Elroco S, Enzler MJ. The macrolides. erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 613-34. PubMed
25. Cunliffe WJ, Simpson NB. Disorders of sebaceous glands. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, Brethnach SM, editors. Rook/Wilkinson/Ebling Textbook of dermatology. 6. Milan: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1998. pp. 1927–84.
