Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Histoid Leprosy: A Prospective Study
Clinico-Epidemiological Profile of Histoid Leprosy: A Prospective Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v9i1.1842Keywords:
Histoid leprosy, Epidemiology, IndiaAbstract
Introduction: Described for the first time by Wade in 1960, considered by some as a variant of Lepromatous Leprosy and accepted by others as a distinct entity, Histiod leprosy is characterized by cutaneous and subcutaneous nodules and plaques present over apparently normal skin. The presence of spindle shaped cells on histopathology, the absence of globi inspite of having high bacillary index and rarity of type II reactions despite being on lepromatous pole of Ridley Jopling classification makes this variety a unique entity. Increase in the number of such cases prompted us to study the Clinico-epidemiological profile of patients diagnosed as Histoid leprosy in our out -patient Department. Aim: To study Clinico-epidemiological profile of patients diagnosed as having Histoid Leprosy between the period of April 2015 to march 2017 in the Department of Dermatology Venereology and leprosy. Method: A prospective study of newly diagnosed patients with Histoid Leprosy on the basis of clinical, bacteriological and histopathological features was conducted during a period of 2 years. The demographic and other parameters were analysed from prescribed case record forms. Results: 420 new cases of leprosy were registered in the Department during the period of 2 years. Histoid Leprosy was seen in 20 patients (4.7%). Mean age of 37.8 years along with male preponderance (M: F-3:1) was observed. Approximately 90% of patients did not receive any anti Hansens treatment in the past. De novo Histoid lesions appeared in 75% of patients. Three (15%) patients developed type II lepra reaction (ENL) and two of them had deformity during their first visit. Conclusion: The absence of typical patches of leprosy, pain or itching delays the consultation by the patient thereby posing high risk of transmission to others members of the family. Absence of knowledge in leprosy workers and Medical officers regarding this variant having high bacillary load enhances the risk of missing the detection of Histiod variant. High incidence of Histoid leprosy in our tertiary centre emphasizes the need of house to house survey on regular basis.
References
2. Rodrigues JN (1969) The histoid Leproma: It’s clinical characteristics and significance. Int J Lepr 37: 1-21.
3. Bhutani LK, Bedi TR, Malhotra YK, Kandhari KC, Deo MG (1974) Histoid Leprosy in north India. Int J of Lepr 42: 174-181.
4. Salodkar AD and Kalla G (1995) A clinic-epidemiological study of leprosy in northwest Rajasthan; Jodhpur. IndJ of Lepr 62:161-166.
5. Sehgal VN and Shrivastava G (1988) Histoid Leprosy: a prospective diagnostic study in 38 patients. Dermatologica III: 212-217.
6. Sehgal VN, Aggarwal A, Shrivastava G, Shrma N, Sharma S (2005) Evolution of Histoid leprosy in lepromatous leprosy. Int J Dermatol 44: 576-578.
7. Kaur L, Dogra S, De D Sakhia UN (2009) Histoid leprosy: a retrospective study of 40 cases from India. Br J Dermatol 160: 305-310.
8. Vibhu Mendiratta, Arpita Jain, Ram Chander, Anamita Khan, MeenuBarara (2011) A nine-years clinic-epidemiological study of Histoid Hansens in India. J Infect DevCtries 2011; 5(2):128-131.
9. Kalla G, Purohit S, Vyas MC (2000) Histoid, a clinical variant of multibacillary leprosy; report from so called endemic areas. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 68; 267-271.
10. Nigam PK, and Singh G (1990) Mucosal and Genital lesions in Histoid leprosy. Int J Dermatol 29; 207-208.
11. Palit A, Inamdar AC 2007. Histoid leprosy as reservoir of disease: a challenge to leprosy elimination. Lepr Rev 78: 47-49.
12. J Lab Physicians. 2011 Jul-Dec; 3(2): 110–112.