Basic Workshop for Medical Teachers : Effectiveness and Impact
Basic Workshop for Medical Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v5i2.713Keywords:
MET, Teaching Learning methodsAbstract
A Structured questionnaire was given to 41 teachers from the first two batches of three day basic course in MET at NKP SIMS, Nagpur, to seek individual opinion on the impact of the program and possible modifications produced in their teaching activities. The opinions of the faculty about their post course teaching activities were analyzed. Result: 1. 57 % Professors were benefitted substantially from interactive teaching techniques and structured clinical assessment, 57% markedly from adult learning, learning objectives, positive learning atmosphere, using audiovisual tools, preparing essay questions and preparing MCQ`s. 2.Associate Professors found audio visual tools, structured clinical exam, MCQ`s and adult learning useful 3.Lecturers were able to use MCQ`s, positive learning atmosphere, structured clinical assessment. 4. Newer assessment methods were introduced to undergraduate students more by faculty from clinical department ( 90%) 5. Research projects related to medical education were undertaken more by faculties from clinical departments. 6. Members from non clinical dept introduced new teaching methods and have undergone advanced training in Medical education more than clinical dept. 7. 84.21% Associate Professors introduced newer teaching learning methods 8. Research projects are undertaken more by lecturers. Conclusion: 1. Three day basic course helps teachers increase their knowledge regarding medical education and implement newer teaching learning and assessment methods to students. 2. Teachers are now sensitized to changes in medical education ,research and are ready to undergo advanced training and attend conferences.
References
2. Baral N ,Paudel BH,Das BK,Aryal M,Das BP.Jha N,Lamsal M. An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal . Nepal Med Coll J.2007 Sep;9(3):157-61
3. D.K.Shrinivas,B.V.Adkoli . Faculty development in medical education in India: The need of the day. Al Ameen J Med Sci 2009,2(1):6-13
4. Anderson J,Gale J,Tomlinson RWS . Training of medical teachers. Lancet 1974;2:566
5. Sheets KJ,Henry RC. Assessing the impact of faculty development programmes in medical education. J Med Educ 1984;59:746-8
6. Sophia Mahler,Dan E.Benor. Short and long term effects of a Teacher Training workshop in medical school.Higher Education 1984,vol.13,No.3.pp265-273.
7. Musal B,Abacioglu H,Dicle O,Akalin E,Sarioglu S,Esen A. Faculty development programme in Dokuz Eylul School for Medicine:in the processMed Edu Online 2002. 7:2
8. Ozyurda F,Dokmeci F,Palaoglu O,Arda B. The role of interactive training skills courses in medical education at the Ankara University School of Medicine. Teach Learn Med 2002,14: 189-193
9. Wilkerson L, Irby D. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med.1998 Apr;73(4):387-96
10. Ozlem Sarikaya,Sibel Kalaca,Berrak C,Yegen and Sanda Cali . The impact of a faculty development programme: evaluation based on the self assessment of medical educators from preclinical and clinical disciplines. Advan in Physiol Edu 2010. 34:35-40.
11. Baraffio A,Kayser B,Vermeulen B,Jacquet J,Vu NV . Improvement of tutorial skills: an effect of workshops or experience? Acad Med 1999. 74; s75-s7.
