Visual Rehabilitation of Aphakia – The Indian Perspective
Visual Rehabilitation of Aphakia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v4i1.456Keywords:
Secondary Implantation, Aphakia, visual outcomeAbstract
Aim of study: To evaluate efficacy of surgical intervention in patients having aphakia by secondary IOL implant and to study their complications.Design: A time bound study for management of aphakia in the department of ophthalmology , SAIMS Indore from Feb. 2004 to Feb. 2012. Method: After clinical evaluation on individual basis, we carried out a secondary procedure on thirty two eyes of thirty one patients from age group twenty-six months to seventy four years. Placement of implant in posterior compartment was given first priority in cases of aphakia reporting on out patient basis. In cases where cataract surgery was eventful or could not be completed we preferred doing in the bag placement.If this was not feasible then placement of haptic in ciliary sulcus was the next preferred choice.In the event of pre-existing PAS or insuffecient iris ,we chose to do scleral fixation. In absence of these with inadequate capsular support, anterior chamber placement of lens was done . Power of intraocular lens was calculated by SRK formula. In all cases, except one ab externo, a scleral tunnel was made or previous tunnel used for implantation, depending on duration elapsed between cataract surgery and secondary implantation. Best corrected visual acuity for distance and near was determined at the end of six weeks. In traumatic cases A-Scan biometry was done after six weeks using aphakic mode. Undercorrection of implant power in paediatric patients was done according to age. Result: On the basis of visual acuity recorded patients were categorized into three groups. Twenty four (80%) patients achieved BCVA of 6 /18 or better, four(13.3%) patients gained vision between 6/24 to 6 /60 while two (6.6%) had visual acuity between 3/60 to 5/60. Mean spherical refractive correction was - 0.616 , mean value of cylinder was -0.742 ,which is considerred the most optimal and desired outcome after IOL implantation. Conclusion: Though secondary intervention was done in eyes where ocular tissues had undergone prior surgical handling , inclusive of patients with poor visual prognosis, still 80% could achieve BCVA 6/18 or better. This shows that secondary implantation is an effective means of rehabilitating aphakic patients. Traumatic cases should better be dealt with by a sequential approach.
References
5. Huber C. Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. J Am Intraocular Implant Soc 1981;7:244-49.ade F,Oliveira A,Frasson M. Benefit of against-the-rule astigmatism to unocrrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:82-85. 6. Is pseudophakic astigmatism a desirable goal ?KM Nagpal, C Desai, RH Trivedi AR Vasavada IJO Yr 2000 vol :48 issue 3 page213-6 7. Sasahara M, Kiru J,Yoshimura N Endoscopy assisted transscleral suture fixation to reduce the incidence of intraocular lens dislocation. J.Cataract surgery 2005,;31:1777-80 8. Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR, et al. Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:238-244. 9. Peer J,Wood M.Intraocular Iens implantation in developing countries. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990 16:621-623 10.Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, et al. Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:840-859. 11. Azizur Rahman, Israr Ahmed Bhutto,Sadia Bukhari Mazharul Hassan Muhammad Nasir Bhatti Pakistan J. Ophthalmology 2011 vol 27 No.2 Visual outcome and complications in ab externo sclera fixation IOL in aphakia 12. Foster CS,Stavrou P,Zafirakis P,et al Intraocular Lens removal in patients with uveitis,Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:31-37