Reference values of Functional Reach Test in Gujarati Population
Reference values of Functional Reach Test in Gujarati Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v10i1.2492Keywords:
Balance performance, Functional Reach test, Reference valuesAbstract
Background & Objectives: Functional reach test is used to assess dynamic balance in individuals. The objective of the study is to estimate the reference values for functional reach test in Gujarati population. Methods: Observational; cross sectional study design was conducted on 843 normal healthy individuals with age group 18-60 years. Functional reach measured with subject standing next to the wall (without touching it), with shoulder flexed to 90°, elbow fully extended with hand full fist. Initial marking is made at the position of 3rd metacarpal along the yardstick on the wall. Subject is then instructed to lean as far forward as possible without taking a step or losing balance. Second marking is then made again using 3rd metacarpal as reference along the yardstick on the wall. The difference between two markings is the forward reach distance used for functional reach test. Results: Reference range for males is 9 – 19 inches and females is 7 – 17 inches. Negative correlation (Ï = -0.25) between functional reach and age whereas a positive correlation (Ï = 0.47) between functional reach and height. Interpretation & Conclusion: Norms for functional reach test has been established for Gujarati population. Age and Height are the contributory factors affecting functional reach. [Rathod S Natl J Integr Res Med, 2019; 10(1):21-24]
References
2. O'Sullivan S. Examination of motor control: motor control and motor learning. In O'Sullivan S, Schimtiz T. Physical Rehabilitation.: Jaypee; 2007. p. 256.
3. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler. J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. Journal of gerontology. 1990 Nov; 45(6): p. M192-7.
4. Isles RC, Choy NL, Steer M, Nitz JC. Normal values of balance tests in women aged 20–80. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004 Aug; 52(8): p. 1367-72.
5. Bohannon RW, Richard W, Wolfson LI, White W. Functional Reach of Older Adults: Normative Reference Values Based on New and Published data. Physiotherapy. ; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2017.03.006.
6. Vetrayan J, Ab Rasid MS, Paulraj SJ. Normative Study on Postural Stability in Standing for Different Ethnicity in Malaysia Measure by Functional Reach Test. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013; 14(5): p. 656-661.
7. Deshmukh AA, Ganesan S, Tedla JS. Normal Values of Functional Reach and Lateral Reach Tests in Indian School Children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;: p. 23-30.
8. Pandian JS, Minaz SU, Johney A. Normative data for Functional Reach Test in Indian Children. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. 2011; 5(2): p. 72-75.
9. Srikanth L, Tealng V. Relationship of Age, Gender & Anthropometric Factors on Forward and Lateral Functional Reach in Standing in Normal Indian Adults. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal. 2015; 9(4): p. 92-97.
10. Aggarwal S, Kumar D. Lower extremity muscle strength and balance performance in Indian community dwelling elderly men aged 50 years and above. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. 2006.
