Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia: Comparsion Of Hemodynamic Parameters In Cardiac Surgeries

Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia

Authors

  • Dr. Himanshu Shah
  • Dr. Mrugank Bhavsar
  • Dr. Mansi Gandhi

Keywords:

A Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Surgery, Propofol, Fentanyl, Isoflurane

Abstract

Aim: The hemodynamic effects of propofol-fentanyl and isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia during surgery were compared in 100 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valvular surgeries. Material and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups randomly. Group PF (n=50) were induced with Fentanyl, Midazolam, Vecuronium and Propofol infusion. While Group IF (n=50) were induced with Fentanyl, Midazolam, Vecuronium and Isoflurane (0-2%) as per the standard doses. Hemodynamic measurements were made before induction of anesthesia and at various times throughout the surgery. Observation and Results: Significant decreases in mean arterial pressure MAP, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI), and stroke volume index (SVI) occurred after 15 minutes of propofol anesthesia. With isoflurane MAP was well maintained with reductions in LVSWI and SVI. Isoflurane was, however, associated with a slight increase in heart rate (HR), whereas no significant change in HR in patients receiving propofol. With both techniques there was no significant change in systemic vascular resistance index. Isoflurane prevents myocardial damage and thus it is cardio protective by developing ischemic preconditioning phenomenon. Conclusion: The study suggests that propofol-fentanyl anesthesia is an acceptable technique but Isoflurane- fentanyl is still preferred due to less hemodynamic instability and greater myocardial protection in cardiac surgeries. 

References

1. Thomas E J Healy, Paul R Knight. Wylie and Churchill‐Davidson’s A Practice of Anesthesia, 7th Edn. Arnold London. 2003.
2. Forrest, James B., Cahalan, Michael et al. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. II Results. Anesthesiology 1990(72)252-261.
3. Eger Ei, White Ae, Brown Cl. A test of the carcinogenicity of enflurane, isoflurane, halothane, methoxyflurane, and nitrous oxide in mice. Anesth Analg 1978; 57: 678-694.
4. Frink, Edward J. Jr MD; Malan, Philip T. PhD, MD; Atlas, Matthew MD; Clinical Comparison of Sevoflurane and Isoflurane in Healthy Patients. February 1992 (74)(2).168-172.
5. Hoka S, Yamaura K, Takenaka T. Propofol-induced increase in vascular capacitance is due to inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictive activity. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1495-1500.
6. Daniel M, Eger EII, Weiskopf RB, et al. Propofol fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to rapid increases in desflurane concentrations. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 75-80
7. Ng A, Tan SW, Lee HS. Effect of propofol infusion on the endocrine response to cardiac surgery. AnaesthIntens Care 1995;23: 543-7
8. Schwall B, Jakob W, Sessler DI. Less adrenergic activation during cataract surgery with total intravenous than with local anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 343-7
9. T. Kurita1, K. Morita1, T. Kazama and S. Sato: Comparison of isoflurane and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia in aswine model of asphyxia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 91 (2003)(6): 871-7.
10. Lepage JY. Left ventricular function during propofol and fentanyl anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease. Assessment with Radionuclide approach. Anesth Analg 1988 (67):949-955.
11. Paul S. Negative inotropic effect of propofol as evaluated by the regional preload recruitable stroke work relationship in chronically instrumented dogs. J. Am. S. Ansth. 1993(78):100-108.
12. Michael B. Howie. A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Comparison of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl When Combined with Isoflurane/Propofol for Early Extubation in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1084–1093.
13. Carlo Sorbara. Propofol-fentanyl versus isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting: Effect on myocardial contractility and peripheral hemodynamics. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 1995:(9)(1):18-23.
14. Mulier JP et al. Cardiodynamic effects of propofol on regional myocardial function in the normal and acute ischemic heart segment in dogs. Anesth Anlag 70:600-607. 1990.
15. Phillips AS, McMurray TJ, Mirakhur RK, Gibson FM, Elliott P. Propofol-fentanyl anesthesia: a comparison with isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia in coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgery.J Cardiothorac Vascular Anesth. 1994 8(3):289-96.
16. Reiz 5, Balfors E, Sorensen MB, Ariola S, Friedman A, Truedsson H. Isoflurane- powerful coronary vasodilator in patientswith coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 1983;59:91-7.
17. Larsen R, Hilfiker 0, Merkel G, Sonntag H, Drobnik L. Myocardial oxygen balance during enflurane and isoflurane anesthesia for coronary artery surgery. Anesthesiology 1984;61.
18. Engoren MC, Kraras C, Garzia F.: Propofol-based versus fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12(2):177-81.
19. Oguchi T, Kashimoto S, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura T, Kumazawa T. Comparative effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane on function and metabolism in the ischaemic rat heart. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 74: 569 – 75.
20. Kanaya N, Kobayashi I, Nakamaya M, Fujita S, Namiki A. ATP sparing effect of isoflurane during ischaemia and reperfusion of the canine heart. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 74: 563 – 8.
21. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer MD. Preconditioning with ischaemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74: 1124 – 36.
22. Jenkins DP, Pugsley WB, Alkhulaifi AM, Kemp M, Hooper J, Yellon DM. Ischaemic
preconditioning reduces troponin T release in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart 1997; 77: 314 – 18.
23. Kloner RA, Shook T, Przyklenk K, et al. Previous angina alters in-hospital outcome in TIMI A clinical correlate to preconditioning? Circulation 1995; 91: 37 – 45.
24. Kersten JR, Schmeling TJ, Pagel PS, Gross GJ, Warltier DC. Isoflurane mimics ischaemic preconditioning via activation of K (ATP) channels: reduction of myocardial infarct size with an acute memory phase. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 361 – 70.
25. Belhomme D, Peynet J, Louzy M, Launay J-M, Kitakaze M, Menasche P. Evidence for preconditioning by isoflurane in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1999; 100:1340 – 4.
26. Reiz 5, Ostman M. Regional coronary hemodynamics during isoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia in patients with ischemic heart disease. Anesth Analg 1985;64:570-6.
27. N. M. Agnew,S. H. Pennefather,G. N. Russell. Isoflurane and coronary heart disease. Anaesthesia 2002 (57)(4):338–347.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-31

How to Cite

Shah, D. H., Bhavsar, D. M., & Gandhi, D. M. (2013). Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia: Comparsion Of Hemodynamic Parameters In Cardiac Surgeries: Propofol Versus Isoflurane Anesthesia. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 4(6), 44–49. Retrieved from http://nicpd.ac.in/ojs-/index.php/njirm/article/view/2247

Issue

Section

Original Articles