Dynamics Of Listserv Discussion On Educational Research: Dynamics of Listserv Discussion on Educational Research

Dr. Latha Rajendra Kumar; Dr. Komaladevi Sampath Damodar; Thomas Chacko

Authors

Dr. Latha Rajendra Kumar
Dr. Komaladevi Sampath Damodar
Thomas Chacko

Keywords:

Listsev discussions, Educational research

Abstract

Background: PSG â€“FAIMER Regional Institute Listserv generates discussions among faculty, fellows and scholars working and interested in the field of Medical education research. The online programme is designed to teach educational method, professional networking and leadership skills to promote development of professional relationship among participants. Method: In the month long discussions on Educational research, 306 mails were exchanged and various topics were discussed. The process involved presenting content and questions in an academic manner, focusing discussions, establishing knowledge by articles and web sources and responding to technical concerns. Results: During the process of the discussions, participants expressed that they were enjoying the sessions and were richly rewarded in terms of knowledge transfer about Educational Research. Originality/value: Online forums are great sources to exchange and learn information on Medical education for busy practitioners and medical teachers. Conclusion: Online discussions are conducive in continuing medical education programmes.

References

1. Anderson T, Rourke L, Garrison DR, Archer W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Seattle, WA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2001. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Available at: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
2. Garrison DR. Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Boltons Landing, NY: Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Sloan ALN Workshop; 2002
3. Picciano AG. Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2002; 6 (1): 21-40.
4. Stephen J, Elliott MD, Robyn C, Elliott JD. Internet Listserv and Pediatrics: Newly Emerging Legal and Clinical Practice Issues. Pediatrics.1996; 97 (3): 399-400
5. Hernandez-Borges A, Macias-Cervi P, Gaspar-Guardado MA , de Arcaya M. TA, Ruiz-Rabaza A, Ormazabal-Ramos C. Assessing the Relative Quality of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Internet Mailing Lists,Anesth. Analg.1999; 89(2): 520 - 520.
6. Gilas T, Schein M, Frykberg EA. Surgical Internet Discussion List Surginet): A Novel Venue for International Communication among Surgeons. Arch Surg.1998; 133(10): 1126 - 1130.
7. Berge ZL,Collins MP. Perceptions of e-moderators about their roles and functions in moderating electronic mailing lists. Distance Education: An International Journal, 2000; 21(1), 81-100.
8. EJ817572 - Self-Regulation of Learning within Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ817572&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ817572
9. Rita Sood. Medical education in India. Medical teacher, 2008; 30:585-591
10. Majumdar MAA. Issues and priorities of Medical education research in Asia. Annals Academy of medicine.2004; 33(2): 257-263.
11.Open and distance learning, ,Trends, Policy and Strategy Considerations , Available at URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001284/128463e.pdf

Dynamics Of Listserv Discussion On Educational Research