Effectiveness of Flipped Class Room as A Teaching Tool: A Pilot Study
Effectiveness of Flipped Class Room as A Teaching Tool: A Pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v8i4.1288Keywords:
Flipped class, Test for comprehension and knowledge, test for clinical application, PhysiologyAbstract
Background & Objective: In flipped class, active teaching learning occurs outside while conventional classroom is used for problem solving. We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a pilot flipped class to improve competence of undergraduate medical students in physiology. Methods: A guided-inquiry learning activity was developed and conducted to complement recorded, previously viewed didactic lecture. The activity was constructed to focus on critical thinking and application of basic principles of physiology of taste and smell. A combination of independent work and active discussion with the facilitators and guided student response provided student-facilitator interaction. Student learning was evaluated by comparing Test 1 (comprehension and knowledge) and Test 2(clinical application) assessment results. Students’ perception was obtained using a mixed closed and open ended questionnaire. Results: Thirty-nine out of forty participated in the study, 38/39 (97%) scored above 50% in the test for comprehension and knowledge. 26/39 (66%) of the students scored between 50-75% in the test for clinical application. 7/13 have consistent performance in both test 1 and 2, while the remaining 6 students deteriorated in test 2. Most students gave a positive feed-back regarding inclusion of flipped class Interpretation and Conclusion: The flipped class model included active-learning and formative assessments that provided students spaced and repetitive curricular engagement. The intervention transformed the classroom interactions and contributed to improved student understanding of the topic.[Roopashree NJIRM 2017; 8(4):78-84]
References
2. Richardson D. Don’t dump the didactic lecture; fix it. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008;32(1):23–24.
3. Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31(1):30–43.
4. Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):38–42.
5. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement [Internet]. International Society for Technology in Education; 2014 [cited 2016 Dec 13]. Available from: https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=r4OZCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Bergmann+J,+Sams+A&ots=ZrO8-wZvLa&sig=bsPDW_Oy4pemks6BErtRncsXl40
6. Gillispie V. Using the Flipped Classroom to Bridge the Gap to Generation Y. Ochsner J. 2016;16(1):32–36.
7. Young TP, Bailey CJ, Guptill M, Thorp AW, Thomas TL. The flipped classroom: a modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):938.
8. Schwartz TA. Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2014; 53(4):199–206.
9. Chua JSM, Lateef FA. The flipped classroom: viewpoints in Asian Universities. Educ Med J [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Dec 13]; 6(4). Available from: http://www.eduimed.com/index.php/eimj/article/view/316
10. Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M. The evidence for “flipping outâ€: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 38:15–21.
11. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002; 77(10):S86–S93.
12. Goldberg HR, Haase E, Shoukas A, Schramm L. Redefining classroom instruction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30(3):124–127.
13. Pierce R, Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom†model of a renalpharmacotherapy module. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012; 76(10):196.
14. Moffett J, Mill AC. Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014; 5:415.
15. Moraros J, Islam A, Yu S, Banow R, Schindelka B. Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Med Educ. 2015; 15(1):1.
16. Baker JW. The“classroom flipâ€: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. 2000 [cited 2016 Dec 15]; Available from: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/media_and_applied_communications_publications/15/
17. Thompson C. How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Mag. 2011; 126:1–5.
18. Wood KL, Jensen D, Bezdek J, Otto KN. Reverse engineering and redesign: Courses to incrementally and systematically teach design. J Eng Educ. 2001; 90(3):363.
19. Bergmann J, Sams A. Before you flip, consider this: Leaders of the flipped classroom movement say each teacher will have a different experience, but securing school leadership support, time, and IT resources will be important to every effort. Phi Delta Kappan. 2012; 94(2):25.
20. RajaRatNam N, D’Cruz SM. Is the Time Right to Start Using Flipped Classrooms in Indian Medical Colleges? J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2015; 9(9):JL01.
21. Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996; 13(6):522–526.
22. O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. “Any other comments?†Open questions on questionnaires–a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4(1):25.
23. Moser CA, Kalton G. Question wording. Soc Res Princ Proced Open Univ Milton Keynes. 1978;
24. Fink A, Kosecoff J. An Evaluation Primer. 1978; Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED159205
25. Harris IB. Qualitative methods. In: International handbook of research in medical education [Internet]. Springer; 2002. p. 45–95. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_3
26. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills [Internet]. 1984; Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1163741.pdf
27. Flores i Alarcia Ã’, Bravo A, Silva P, others. The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis
based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2016 Vol 13 Núm 21 [Internet]. 2016; Available from: http://repositori.udl.cat/handle/10459.1/57600
28. Prober CG. Lecture halls without lectures–a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(18):1657.
29. Bloom BS, College C of, Examiners U. Taxonomy of educational objectives [Internet]. Vol. 2. Longmans, Green New York; 1964. Available from: http://www.reden.ch/f7info/infolisten/zb_did_meth_bloom_01s.pdf
30. Morton DA, Colbert-Getz JM. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom’s taxonomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017; 10(2):170–175.
31. Rose E, Claudius I, Tabatabai R, Kearl L, Behar S, Jhun P. The flipped classroom in emergency medicine using online videos with interpolated questions. J Emerg Med. 2016; 51(3):284–291.
32. Tainter CR, Wong NL, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Bittner EA. The “flipped classroom†model for teaching in the intensive care unit: rationale, practical considerations, and an example of successful implementation. J Intensive Care Med. 2017;32(3):187–196.
33. Munson A, Pierce R. Flipping content to improve student examination performance in a pharmacogenomics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(7):103.
34. Fulton K. Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learn Lead Technol. 2012;39(8):12–17.
